Reviewing the literature on
autism, various terms are used to classify the various shades of autism.-
Implications of multiple types of autism
·
Autism
·
High Functioning autism
·
Asperger’s syndrome
·
Autistic Spectrum Disorder
(ASD)
The trend coming from the US
is to classify all the disorders as a single disorder, and then by widening the
definition, draw in an even greater pool of subjects; hence the so-called
autism epidemic.
This is extremely
un-scientific and indeed unhelpful.
Autism is just a collection of observable and indeed measurable
behaviors. The extent to which a subject
is affected by each type of behavior varies wildly.
When a patient goes to his
doctor, an initial investigation might involve taking temperature, measuring
pulse, examining ear, nose and throat.
The doctor does not simply conclude the patient is sick; he has to look
for a specific combination of symptoms and measurable variables and make a specific diagnosis.
Now consider a rare
brain disorder, Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA).
SCA affects about 0.025% of
the population. Moderate to severe
autism affects about 0.3% of the population.
We can say that autism is 12 times more prevalent than SCA, or if we use
the latest American definition and use CDC data we would say that autism is 40
times more prevalent than SCA.
Yet SCA seems far better
understood and thoroughly researched than ASD.
You need go no further than Wikipedia, to see that 60 sub-types have
been identified. The disease itself is a
progressive and degenerative but each sub-type has a unique cause and indeed a
unique prognosis. Usually the diagnosis comes after examination
by a neurologist, which includes a physical exam, family history, and testing
such as an MRI of the brain and spine and a spinal tap.
The prognosis is not good for any of the 60 types, but at
least in Japan the pharmaceutical industry did develop a drug therapy. Somewhat bizarrely, this therapy is
unavailable outside Japan. Equally bizarre
is that a drug like Prozac, which is commonly prescribed to children in the US with
ASD, is illegal in Japan.
The major sub-types of SCA are shown in the table.
Implications of multiple types of autism
If
autism also has many variants, it likely will also have many different causes
and therefore likely have different pharmacological interventions.
This
has a massive impact on clinical trials for possible therapies.
The
fact that a subgroup of 20% might respond to a treatment but 80% do not, should
perhaps be viewed as a success and not a failure.
Drug
therapies must be related to a specific biological failure.
If,
as seems likely, the same aberrant behaviour can be caused by more than one
biological failure, then researchers have to be very much more wary how they
conduct their clinical trials and more importantly how they interpret the results.
I have SCA and my sister who is on the spectrum (as was likely my Dad) has asked that I submit dna to a research project for autism and I wholeheartedly agree with you. But know that with the advances made in Whole Genome Sequencing, discoveries are being made every day [SCA 27B wasn't identified until 12/2022). they need to first identify one genetic anomaly conclusively so they then have some indication of where / how to look for more anomalies. I don't have data to back my belief, but having worked with children who were likely autistic back in the 70's and not identified as such, I believe we are starting to see more severe cases now than in the past, perhaps genetic caused by environmental factors? Yet SCA has been around for many, many generations (the "Darby Glide", the "Carlson Shuffle", every family had names for the lack of motor function), so they have had more time to really zero in on it. And it has been a long, long road with SCA. Not sure there's much comfort given knowing which type but still no cure or anything other than drugging for symptoms. Isn't that really the same boat autism is in now?
ReplyDelete