An
interesting trial of a TNF- α and IL-6 inhibitor in autism has been brought to my attention. It was by Michael Chez, the neurologist from
Sacramento, who has made several appearances on this blog.
By
coincidence, a copy of his book arrived this week. The book is called “Autism and its Medical Management”, Chez is one of the few mainstream doctors who does try and treat
autism. The book is rational, readable
and in no way radical, so you could show it to your family doctor without
upsetting him/her. Chez does particularly focus
on distinguishing regressive from non-regressive autism, as do I. His view is
that it is regressive autism, even if it was regression from slightly
abnormal. The important part is that some
learned skills, like language, were lost sometime after 12 months of age. He believes that regressive autism has a different
basis to non-regressive autism; he has his own ideas about this, but he admits there
is no concrete proof.
The book is
a few years old and Chez has published much work in the intervening few
years.
The paper I
was referred to is:-
Lenalidomide, an analogue of
thalidomide, has the potential to invoke significant changes in TNF-α and other
immunomodulatory cytokines. If
thalidomide sounds familiar, it is the drug from the 1950s, that turned out to
be very unsafe for use in pregnant women and around the world 10,000 babies
were born with
malformation of the limbs.
Lenalidomide has been used to successfully treat both inflammatory disorders and cancers in the past 10 years. There are multiple mechanisms of action. It is extremely expensive, according to NICE:-
“Lenalidomide
25 mg capsules cost £4368 per 21 capsules (excluding VAT; ‘British
national formulary’ [BNF] edition 55). Dosage is continued or modified based
upon clinical and laboratory findings. For example, if lenalidomide is
continued for ten 28-day cycles without dose reduction, the cost would be
£43,680.”
Dr Chez does not mention the cost of Lenalidomide, but he uses a tiny
dose of 2.5 mg; This would cost £20, or $30, a day. This might also explain the small number (7) of
participants in the trial.
“2.2. Drug and Dosing. Lenalidomide 2.5mgs was given daily
for 12 weeks. This low dose was selected to minimize the risk
of adverse effects. In addition, because this was a pilot study,
the goal was to test the lowest dose that could potentially
lead to improvements.”
The drug did reduce TNF-α levels and there were some
behavioral improvements, but nothing dramatic.
Perhaps a higher dosage would have had a greater effect?
There
were only seven participants and the data on the seven is not complete; also
the dose of Lenalidomide
was very low. I think it is really only
fair to conclude that the trial is interesting but that a much cheaper drug
would need to be found and tested on a much larger number of participants.
“Despite the limitations, to our knowledge, this open-label study
represents the first attempt to treat autism by specifically targeting elevated
innate inflammatory cytokine levels. Safety monitoring and pharmacokinetic data
were successfully completed during this pilot study and exploratory
observations of clinical and cytokine changes suggest a trend towards
improvement. Correlating treatment outcomes with cytokine level changes may be
a target in future autism spectrum treatment, especially in those with known
maternal or postnatal immunological risk factors. Larger blinded and
placebo-controlled studies assessing cytokine measurement and cytokine-targeted
treatment in autism patients with TNF-α or other inflammatory cytokine
elevation are warranted.”
To his credit, unlike the researchers
in Athens who trialed Neuroprotek in a recent post, Chez went about his pilot
study in a scientific manner and collected both the biological and the behavioral
data. In other words, he measured the
before and after levels of the inflammatory cytokines and the before and after behavioral
rating scales. Well done Dr Chez.
Dear Peter
ReplyDeleteYou can find Paul Whiteley's comments on this paper. I also feel this is not a good study. To get CSF sample for this study is traumatic.