GABA A Receptors in Autism – How and Why to Modulate Them

This post will get complicated, since it will look at many aspects of the GABA _A receptor, rather than just a small fraction that usually appear in the individual pieces of the scientific literature. 

It was prompted by comments I have received from regular readers, regarding Bumetanide, Clonazepam, epilepsy and whether there might be alternatives with the same effect.  So it is really intended to answer some complex issues. 

There are some new interesting facts/observations that may be of wider interest, just skip the parts that too involved.

Regarding today’s picture, most readers of this blog are female and by the way, while the US is the most common location by far,  a surprisingly high number of page views come from France, Hong Kong, South Africa and Poland.

GABA

We have seen that GABA is one of the brain's most important neurotransmitters and we know that various forms of GABA dysfunction are associated with autism, epilepsy and indeed schizophrenia.

One recurring aspect in the research is the so-called excitatory-inhibitory balance of GABA.

The way the brain is understood to function assumes that GABA should be inhibitory and NMDA should be excitatory.

What makes GABA inhibitory is the level of the electrolyte chloride within the cells.  If the level is “wrong”, then GABA may be excitatory and the fine balance required with the NMDA receptor is lost.  The brain then cannot function as intended.

Source: Sage Therapeutics, a company that is developing new drugs that target GABA_A and NMDA receptors

To understand what is going wrong in autism and how to treat it we need to take a detailed look at the GABA_A receptor and all the anion transport mechanism associated with it.  Most research looks at either the receptor OR the transporters and exchangers.

Anion Transport Mechanisms of the GABA_A receptor

You will either need to be a doctor, scientist or very committed to keep reading here.

We know that level of chloride within the cells is critical to whether GABA behaves as excitatory or inhibitory.  This has all been established in the laboratory.

The usual target in autism is the NKCC1 transporter that lets chloride INTO cells, but as you can see in the two figures below, there are other ways to affect the concentration of chloride.  

·        The KCC2 transporter lets chloride out of the cells

·        The sodium dependent anion exchanger (NDAE) lets chloride out of the cells

·        The sodium independent anion exchanger 3 (AE3), lets chloride in.  It extrudes intracellular HCO₃^- in exchange for extracellular Cl^-.

All this does actually matter since we will be able to link it back to a known genetic dysfunction and it would suggest alternative therapeutic avenues.  We can also see how epilepsy fits into the picture.

Source: Two types of chloride transporters are required for GABA_A receptor-mediated inhibition in C. elegans

 Source:- InhibitoryRegulation of Excitatory Neurotransmission

NKCC1 in Autism

Without doubt, the transporter that controls the flow of chloride into the brain is the expert field of Ben Ari.

His recent summary paper is below:-

The GABA excitatory /inhibitory developmental sequence: a personal journey

He showed that by reducing the level of chloride in the autistic brain using the common diuretic Bumetanide, a marked improvement in many peoples’ autism could be achieved

This post is really about expanding more on what he does not tell us.

KCC2 in Autism

In typical people, very early in life the KCC2 transporter develops and as a result level of chloride falls inside the cells, since the purpose of the transporter is to extrude chloride.

It appears that in autism this mechanism has been disrupted.  The existing science can show us what has gone wrong.

The following study shows that KCC2 is itself regulated by neuroligin-2 (NL2), a cell adhesion molecule specifically localized at GABAergic synapses.

It gets more interesting because the scientists looking for genetic causes of autism have already identified the gene that encodes NL2, which they call NLGN2 (neuroligin 2) as being associated with autism and schizophrenia (adult onset autism).

GeneCards – the human gene compendium

  

An unexpected role of neuroligin-2 in regulating KCC2 and GABA functional switch

Abstract

Background

GABA_A receptors are ligand-gated Cl^- channels, and the intracellular Cl^- concentration governs whether GABA function is excitatory or inhibitory. During early brain development, GABA undergoes functional switch from excitation to inhibition: GABA depolarizes immature neurons but hyperpolarizes mature neurons due to a developmental decrease of intracellular Cl^- concentration. This GABA functional switch is mainly mediated by the up-regulation of KCC2, a potassium-chloride cotransporter that pumps Cl^- outside neurons. However, the upstream factor that regulates KCC2 expression is unclear.

Results

We report here that KCC2 is unexpectedly regulated by neuroligin-2 (NL2), a cell adhesion molecule specifically localized at GABAergic synapses. The expression of NL2 precedes that of KCC2 in early postnatal development. Upon knockdown of NL2, the expression level of KCC2 is significantly decreased, and GABA functional switch is significantly delayed during early development. Overexpression of shRNA-proof NL2 rescues both KCC2 reduction and delayed GABA functional switch induced by NL2 shRNAs. Moreover, NL2 appears to be required to maintain GABA inhibitory function even in mature neurons, because knockdown NL2 reverses GABA action to excitatory. Gramicidin-perforated patch clamp recordings confirm that NL2 directly regulates the GABA equilibrium potential. We further demonstrate that knockdown of NL2 decreases dendritic spines through down-regulating KCC2.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that in addition to its conventional role as a cell adhesion molecule to regulate GABAergic synaptogenesis, NL2 also regulates KCC2 to modulate GABA functional switch and even glutamatergic synapses. Therefore, NL2 may serve as a master regulator in balancing excitation and inhibition in the brain.

KCC2 in Peripheral nerve injury (PNI)

Autism is not the only diagnosis associated with reduced function of the KCC2 transporter; Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is another.

In this condition researchers sought to counter the failure of KCC2 to remove chloride from within the cell by increasing the flow chloride through the Cl^-/HCO₃^- anion exchanger known as AE3.

Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase augments GABAA receptor-mediated analgesia via a spinal mechanism of action.

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) negatively influences spinal gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic networks via a reduction in the neuron-specific potassium-chloride (K(+)-Cl(-)) cotransporter (KCC2). This process has been linked to the emergence of neuropathic allodynia. In vivo pharmacologic and modeling studies show that a loss of KCC2 function results in a decrease in the efficacy of GABAA-mediated spinal inhibition. One potential strategy to mitigate this effect entails inhibition of carbonic anhydrase activity to reduce HCO3(-)-dependent depolarization via GABAA receptors when KCC2 function is compromised. We have tested this hypothesis here. Our results show that, similarly to when KCC2 is pharmacologically blocked, PNI causes a loss of analgesic effect for neurosteroid GABAA allosteric modulators at maximally effective doses in naïve mice in the tail-flick test. Remarkably, inhibition of carbonic anhydrase activity with intrathecal acetazolamide rapidly restores an analgesic effect for these compounds, suggesting an important role of carbonic anhydrase activity in regulating GABAA-mediated analgesia after PNI. Moreover, spinal acetazolamide administration leads to a profound reduction in the mouse formalin pain test, indicating that spinal carbonic anhydrase inhibition produces analgesia when primary afferent activity is driven by chemical mediators. Finally, we demonstrate that systemic administration of acetazolamide to rats with PNI produces an antiallodynic effect by itself and an enhancement of the peak analgesic effect with a change in the shape of the dose-response curve of the α1-sparing benzodiazepine L-838,417. Thus, carbonic anhydrase inhibition mitigates the negative effects of loss of KCC2 function after nerve injury in multiple species and through multiple administration routes resulting in an enhancement of analgesic effects for several GABAA allosteric modulators. We suggest that carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, many of which are clinically available, might be advantageously employed for the treatment of pathologic pain states.

PERSPECTIVE:

Using behavioral pharmacology techniques, we show that spinal GABAA-mediated analgesia can be augmented, especially following nerve injury, via inhibition of carbonic anhydrases. Carbonic anhydrase inhibition alone also produces analgesia, suggesting these enzymes might be targeted for the treatment of pain

Acetazolamide and midazolam act synergistically to inhibit neuropathic pain

Treatment of neuropathic pain is a major clinical challenge that has been met with minimal success. After peripheral nerve injury, a decrease in the expression of the K–Cl cotransporter KCC2, a major neuronal Cl⁻ extruder, leads to pathologic alterations in GABA_A and glycine receptor function in the spinal cord. The down-regulation of KCC2 is expected to cause a reduction in Cl⁻ extrusion capacity in dorsal horn neurons, which, together with the depolarizing efflux of HCO−3 anions via GABA_A channels, would result in a decrease in the efficacy of GABA_A-mediated inhibition. Carbonic anhydrases (CA) facilitate intracellular HCO−3 generation and hence, we hypothesized that inhibition of CAs would enhance the efficacy of GABAergic inhibition in the context of neuropathic pain. Despite the decrease in KCC2 expression, spinal administration of benzodiazepines has been shown to be anti-allodynic in neuropathic conditions. Thus, we also hypothesized that spinal inhibition of CAs might enhance the anti-allodynic effects of spinally administered benzodiazepines. Here, we show that inhibition of spinal CA activity with acetazolamide (ACT) reduces neuropathic allodynia. Moreover, we demonstrate that spinal co-administration of ACT and midazolam (MZL) act synergistically to reduce neuropathic allodynia after peripheral nerve injury. These findings indicate that the combined use of CA inhibitors and benzodiazepines may be effective in the clinical management of neuropathic pain in humans.

In conclusion, the major finding of the present work is that ACT and MZL act synergistically to inhibit neuropathic allodynia. In light of the available in vitro data reviewed above, a parsimonious way to explain this synergism is that CA inhibition blocks an HCO−3 -dependent positive shift in the E_r of GABA and/or glycine-mediated currents and the consequent tonic excitatory drive mediated by extrasynaptic GABA_A receptors, while preserving shunting inhibition that is augmented by benzodiazepine actions at postsynaptic GABA_A receptors. Obviously, further work is needed at the in vitro level in order to directly examine the cellular and synaptic basis of the ACT-MZL synergism and clinical studies are required to determine the safety of intrathecally applied CA inhibitors in humans. Since MZL and ACT, as well as several other inhibitors of CA [37], are clinically approved, we propose that their use in combination opens up a novel approach for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain

Midazolam and Acetazolamide

The therapeutic as well as adverse effects of midazolam are due to its effects on the GABA_A receptors; midazolam does not activate GABA_A receptors directly but, as with other benzodiazepines, it enhances the effect of the neurotransmitter GABA on the GABA_A receptors (↑ frequency of Cl− channel opening) resulting in neural inhibition. Almost all of the properties can be explained by the actions of benzodiazepines on GABA_A receptors. This results in the following pharmacological properties being produced: sedation, hypnotic, anxiolytic, anterograde amnesia, muscle relaxation and anti-convulsant.

Acetazolamide, usually sold under the trade name Diamox in some countries.  Acetazolamide is a diuretic, and it is available as a (cheap) generic drug.

It is a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor that is used for the medical treatment of glaucoma, epileptic seizure, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, altitude sickness, cystinuria, periodic paralysis, central sleep apnea, and dural ectasia.

In epilepsy, the main use of acetazolamide is in menstrual-related epilepsy and as an adjunct in refractory epilepsy.

Acetazolamide is not an immediate cure for acute mountain sickness; rather, it speeds up part of the acclimatization process which in turn helps to relieve symptoms.  I am pretty sure, many years ago, it was Diamox that I took with me when crossing the Himalayas from Nepal into Tibet.  We did not have any problems with mountain sickness.

If periodic paralysis above rings some bells it should.  Two forms already mentioned in this blog are Hypokalemic periodic paralysis and Andersen Tawil syndrome.  We even referred to a paper suggesting the use of Bumetanide.

Bumetanide prevents transient decreases in muscle force in murine hypokalemic periodic paralysis.

Acetazolamide is a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, hence causing the accumulation of carbonic acid Carbonic anhydrase is an enzyme found in red blood cells that catalyses the following reaction:

hence lowering blood pH, by means of the following reaction that carbonic acid undergoes

Anion exchanger 3 (AE3) in autism

Anion exchange protein 3 is a membrane transport protein that in humans is encoded by the SLC4A3 gene. It exchanges chloride for bicarbonate ions.  It increases chloride concentration within the cell.  AE3 is an anion exchanger that is primarily expressed in the brain and heart

Its activity is sensitive to pH. AE3 mutations have been linked to seizures

Characterization of anEpilepsy-associated variant of the AE3 Cl-/HCO3-exchanger

Bicarbonate (HCO₃^-) transport mechanisms are the principal regulators of pH in animal cells. Such transport also plays a vital role in acid-base movements in the stomach, pancreas, intestine, kidney, reproductive organs and the central nervous system.

Two types of chloride transporters are required for GABA_A receptor-mediated inhibition in C. elegans

Abstract

Chloride influx through GABA-gated Cl⁻ channels, the principal mechanism for inhibiting neural activity in the brain, requires a Cl⁻ gradient established in part by K⁺–Cl⁻ cotransporters (KCCs). We screened for Caenorhabditis elegans mutants defective for inhibitory neurotransmission and identified mutations in ABTS-1, a Na⁺-driven Cl⁻–HCO₃⁻ exchanger that extrudes chloride from cells, like KCC-2, but also alkalinizes them. While animals lacking ABTS-1 or the K⁺–Cl⁻ cotransporter KCC-2 display only mild behavioural defects, animals lacking both Cl⁻ extruders are paralyzed. This is apparently due to severe disruption of the cellular Cl⁻ gradient such that Cl⁻ flow through GABA-gated channels is reversed and excites rather than inhibits cells. Neuronal expression of both transporters is upregulated during synapse development, and ABTS-1 expression further increases in KCC-2 mutants, suggesting regulation of these transporters is coordinated to control the cellular Cl⁻ gradient. Our results show that Na⁺-driven Cl⁻–HCO₃⁻ exchangers function with KCCs in generating the cellular chloride gradient and suggest a mechanism for the close tie between pH and excitability in the brain.

NKCC1 and AE3 Appear to Accumulate Chloride in Embryonic Motoneurons

Abstract

During early development, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) depolarizes and excites neurons, contrary to its typical function in the mature nervous system. As a result, developing networks are hyperexcitable and experience a spontaneous network activity that is important for several aspects of development. GABA is depolarizing because chloride is accumulated beyond its passive distribution in these developing cells. Identifying all of the transporters that accumulate chloride in immature neurons has been elusive and it is unknown whether chloride levels are different at synaptic and extrasynaptic locations. We have therefore assessed intracellular chloride levels specifically at synaptic locations in embryonic motoneurons by measuring the GABAergic reversal potential (E_GABA) for GABA_A miniature postsynaptic currents. When whole cell patch solutions contained 17–52 mM chloride, we found that synaptic E_GABA was around −30 mV. Because of the low HCO₃⁻ permeability of the GABA_A receptor, this value of E_GABA corresponds to approximately 50 mM intracellular chloride. It is likely that synaptic chloride is maintained at levels higher than the patch solution by chloride accumulators. We show that the Na⁺-K⁺-2Cl⁻ cotransporter, NKCC1, is clearly involved in the accumulation of chloride in motoneurons because blocking this transporter hyperpolarized E_GABA and reduced nerve potentials evoked by local application of a GABA_A agonist. However, chloride accumulation following NKCC1 block was still clearly present. We find physiological evidence of chloride accumulation that is dependent on HCO₃⁻ and sensitive to an anion exchanger blocker. These results suggest that the anion exchanger, AE3, is also likely to contribute to chloride accumulation in embryonic motoneurons.

Sodium dependent anion exchanger (NDAE)

Not much has been written about these exchangers, outside of very technical literature.

Anion transport and GABA signaling

Sodium-coupled anion exchange is activated by intracellular acidification (Schwiening and Boron, 1994), suggesting that regulation of the chloride gradient by NDAEs may be closely linked to the regulation of cellular pH. As prolonged neuronal activity can cause neuronal acidification by efflux of bicarbonate through GABA_A receptors (Kaila and Voipio, 1987), sodium-coupled anion exchange may help to maintain a hyperpolarizing chloride reversal potential and thus promote the inhibitory action of GABA. Thus activation of sodium-coupled anion exchange by acidosis may also contribute to seizure termination by promoting a more negative chloride reversal potential and thus promoting the inhibitory effects of GABA.

The GABA_A receptor  (background is cut and paste from Wikipedia)

In order for GABA_A receptors to be sensitive to the action of benzodiazepines they need to contain an α and a γ subunit, between which the benzodiazepine binds. Once bound, the benzodiazepine locks the GABA_A receptor into a conformation where the neurotransmitter GABA has much higher affinity for the GABA_A receptor, increasing the frequency of opening of the associated chloride ion channel and hyperpolarizing the membrane. This potentiates the inhibitory effect of the available GABA leading to sedative and anxiolytic effects.

Structure and function

Schematic diagram of a GABA_A receptor protein ((α1)₂(β2)₂(γ2)) which illustrates the five combined subunits that form the protein, the chloride (Cl^-) ion channel pore, the two GABA active binding sites at the α1 and β2 interfaces, and the benzodiazepine (BDZ) allosteric binding site

The receptor is a pentameric transmembrane receptor that consists of five subunits arranged around a central pore. Each subunit comprises four transmembrane domains with both the N- and C-terminus located extracellularly. The receptor sits in the membrane of its neuron, usually localized at a synapse, postsynaptically. However, some isoforms may be found extrasynaptically. The ligand GABA is the endogenous compound that causes this receptor to open; once bound to GABA, the protein receptor changes conformation within the membrane, opening the pore in order to allow chloride anions (Cl⁻) to pass down an electrochemical gradient. Because the reversal potential for chloride in most neurons is close to or more negative than the resting membrane potential, activation of GABA_A receptors tends to stabilize or hyperpolarise the resting potential, and can make it more difficult for excitatory neurotransmitters to depolarize the neuron and generate an action potential. The net effect is typically inhibitory, reducing the activity of the neuron. The GABA_A channel opens quickly and thus contributes to the early part of the inhibitory post-synaptic potential (IPSP).

Subunits

GABA_A receptors are members of the large "Cys-loop" super-family of evolutionarily related and structurally similar ligand-gated ion channels that also includes nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, glycine receptors, and the 5HT₃ receptor. There are numerous subunit isoforms for the GABA_A receptor, which determine the receptor's agonist affinity, chance of opening, conductance, and other properties.
In humans, the units are as follows:

• six types of α subunits (GABRA1, GABRA2, GABRA3, GABRA4, GABRA5, GABRA6)
• three βs (GABRB1, GABRB2, GABRB3)
• three γs (GABRG1, GABRG2, GABRG3)
• as well as a δ (GABRD), an ε (GABRE), a π (GABRP), and a θ (GABRQ)

There are three ρ units (GABRR1, GABRR2, GABRR3), however these do not coassemble with the classical GABA_A units listed above,^[18] but rather homooligomerize to form GABA_A-ρ receptors (formerly classified as GABA_C receptors but now this nomenclature has been deprecated^[19] ).
Five subunits can combine in different ways to form GABA_A channels. The minimal requirement to produce a GABA-gated ion channel is the inclusion of both α and β subunits, but the most common type in the brain is a pentamer comprising two α's, two β's, and a γ (α₂β₂γ)
The receptor binds two GABA molecules, at the interface between an α and a β subunit



The important subunits for this post are:-

GABRA2,

Very little is written about this subunit.

GABRA3

While the effect of editing on protein function is unknown, the developmental increase in editing does correspond to changes in function of the GABA_A receptor. GABA binding leads to chloride channel activation, resulting in rapid increase in concentration of the ion. Initially, the receptor is an excitatory receptor, mediating depolarisation (efflux of Cl^- ions) in immature neurons before changing to an inhibitory receptor, mediating hyperpolarization(influx of Cl^- ions) later on. GABA_A converts to an inhibitory receptor from an excitatory receptor by the upregulation of KCC2 cotransporter. This decreases the concentration of Cl^- ion within cells. Therefore, the GABA_A subunits are involved in determining the nature of the receptor in response to GABA ligand. These changes suggest that editing of the subunit is important in the developing brain by regulating the Cl^- permeability of the channel during development. The unedited receptor is activated faster and deactivates slower than the edited receptor.

Editing modifies the GABAA receptor subunit α3

Editing of the I/M site is developmentally regulated

A switch in the GABA response from excitatory to inhibitory post-synaptic potentials occurs during early development where an efflux of chloride ions takes place in immature neurons, while there is an influx of chloride ions in mature neurons (Ben-Ari 2002). GABA switches from being excitatory to inhibitory by an up-regulation of the cotransporter KCC2 that decreases the chloride concentration in the cell. However, if GABA itself promotes the expression of KCC2 is still under debate (Ganguly et al. 2001; Ludwig et al. 2003; Titz et al. 2003). Further, the α subunits are critical elements in determining the nature of the GABA_A receptor response to GABA (Böhme et al. 2004). The α3 mRNA (Gabra-3) is present at high levels in several forebrain regions at birth with a major decline after post-natal day 12 (P12), when the expression of α1 is going up (Laurie et al. 1992). The change from α3 to α1 may cause the switch in GABA behavior from excitatory to inhibitory post-synaptic potentials during development.

GABA_A receptors respond to anxiolytic drugs such as benzodiazepines and are thus important drug targets. The benzodiazepine binding site is located at the interface of the α and γ2 subunits (Cromer et al. 2002). Antagonists that bind to this site enhance the effect of GABA by increasing the frequency of GABA-induced channel opening events. Post-transcriptional modifications of the α3 subunit, such as the I/M editing described here, could be important in determining the mechanistic features that are responsible for the diversity of GABA_A receptors and the variability in sensitivity to drugs

Ligands

A number of ligands have been found to bind to various sites on the GABA_A receptor complex and modulate it besides GABA itself.

Types

• Agonists: bind to the main receptor site (the site where GABA normally binds, also referred to as the "active" or "orthosteric" site) and activate it, resulting in increased Cl⁻ conductance.
• Antagonists: bind to the main receptor site but do not activate it. Though they have no effect on their own, antagonists compete with GABA for binding and thereby inhibit its action, resulting in decreased Cl⁻ conductance.
• Positive allosteric modulators: bind to allosteric sites on the receptor complex and affect it in a positive manner, causing increased efficiency of the main site and therefore an indirect increase in Cl⁻ conductance.
• Negative allosteric modulators: bind to an allosteric site on the receptor complex and affect it in a negative manner, causing decreased efficiency of the main site and therefore an indirect decrease in Cl⁻ conductance.
• Open channel blockers: prolong ligand-receptor occupancy, activation kinetics and Cl ion flux in a subunit configuration-dependent and sensitization-state dependent manner.
• Non-competitive channel blockers: bind to or near the central pore of the receptor complex and directly block Cl^- conductance through the ion channel.

The GABA_A receptor include a site where benzodiazepine can bind.  These are drugs that include like valium. Binding at this site increase the effect of GABA.  Since this receptor is meant to be inhibitory, giving valium should make it strong inhibitory, ie calming. 

It was noted that in autism the effect of valium was often the reversed, instead of calming it further increased anxiety.

The Valium is working just fine, it is magnifying the effect the effect of GABA, the problem is that the receptor is functioning as excitatory, the Valium is making it over-excitatory.  Now we come to the reason why.

We know that the excitatory-inhibitory balance is set by the chloride concentration within the cells.  We also know that exact mechanism that determines this level.

Enhancement of Inhibitory Neurotransmission by GABAA ReceptorsHaving α2,3-Subunits Ameliorates Behavioral Deficits in a Mouse Modelof Autism

 Highlights

•BTBR mice have reduced spontaneous GABAergic inhibitory transmission

•Nonsedating doses of benzodiazepines improved autism-related deficits in BTBR mice

•Impairment of GABAergic transmission reduced social interaction in wild-type mice

•Behavioral rescue by low-dose benzodiazepine is GABA_A receptor α_2,3-subunit specific

Summary

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may arise from increased ratio of excitatory to inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain. Many pharmacological treatments have been tested in ASD, but only limited success has been achieved. Here we report that BTBR T⁺ Itpr3^tf/J (BTBR) mice, a model of idiopathic autism, have reduced spontaneous GABAergic neurotransmission. Treatment with low nonsedating/nonanxiolytic doses of benzodiazepines, which increase inhibitory neurotransmission through positive allosteric modulation of postsynaptic GABA_A receptors, improved deficits in social interaction, repetitive behavior, and spatial learning. Moreover, negative allosteric modulation of GABA_A receptors impaired social behavior in C57BL/6J and 129SvJ wild-type mice, suggesting that reduced inhibitory neurotransmission may contribute to social and cognitive deficits. The dramatic behavioral improvement after low-dose benzodiazepine treatment was subunit specific—the α_2,3-subunit-selective positive allosteric modulator L-838,417 was effective, but the α₁-subunit-selective drug zolpidem exacerbated social deficits. Impaired GABAergic neurotransmission may contribute to ASD, and α_2,3-subunit-selective positive GABA_A receptor modulation may be an effective treatment.

  

These results indicate that different subtypes of GABAA receptors may have opposite roles in social behavior, with activation of GABAA receptors containing α_2,3 subunits favoring and of GABAA receptors with α₁  subunits reducing social interaction, respectively.

Because of their broad availability and safety, benzodiazepines and other positive allosteric modulators of GABAA receptors administered at low nonsedating, nonanxiolytic doses that do not induce tolerance deserve consideration as a near-term strategy to improve the core social interaction deficits and repetitive behaviors in ASD.

These results are most consistent with the hypotheses that reduced inhibitory neurotransmission is sufficient to induce autistic-like behaviors in mice and that enhanced inhibitory neurotransmission can reverse autistic-like behaviors.

Epilepsy

I have received various comments about epilepsy.  Epilepsy has many variants, just like autism.  Epilepsy is often comorbid with autism.  GABA dysfunction is known to be closely involved in some types of autism and some types of epilepsy.

It is known that Bumetanide has very different effects in different types of epilepsy.

The question that naturally arises is whether you can give Bumetanide to someone who has autism and epilepsy and if you cannot, is there an alternative with the same desired effect?

Well it appears that any method that changes chloride levels is likely to affect epilepsy.  It appears that all three methods (NKCC1, KCC2 and AE3) would likely have the same impact on epilepsy.

But would it be a good effect or a bad effect?

Would it interact with any existing anti-epilepsy drugs?

I suspect that Bumetanide might be an effective anti-epileptic in people with autism and that other GABA related drugs might no longer be needed.  Quite likely the effect of Bumetanide and the anti-epileptic targeting GABA might be too much.  So the blog reader that pointed out that the bumetanide clinical trial excluded children with epilepsy has highlighted an important point.

While epilepsy is not fully understood and there are various variants, it would seem plausible that the epilepsy common in core classic autism and early regressive autism is the same type and that it is linked to the same excitatory/inhibitory dysfunction.

You may be wonder if other diuretics have anti-epileptic properties. Here is a paper by a Neurologist from Denver on the subject:-

Diuretics as anti-epileptic drugs – Should we go with the Flow

Why is there an excitatory/inhibitory dysfunction in Autism?

People are writing entire books on the GABA excitatory/inhibitory balance.  I was curious as to why this dysfunction exists at all in autism. 

We learnt from Ben-Ari in earlier posts all about this switch from excitatory to inhibitory that is supposed to occur very early on in life, we now have two reasons why this may fail to happen in autism:-

1.     Editing modifies the GABA_A receptor subunit α₃.  The change from α₃ to α₁ may cause the switch in GABA behavior from excitatory to inhibitory post-synaptic potentials during development.  This change appears not to occur in some types of autism.  We see from the Clonazepam research that α₃ and  α₁ have opposite effects in autism.   In autism, activation of GABA_A receptors containing α_2,3 subunits favours social interaction  and activation of α₁  subunits reduces social interaction.

And/Or

2.     The GABA functional switch is mainly mediated by the up-regulation of KCC2, a potassium-chloride cotransporter that pumps Cl^- outside neurons.  NL2 also regulates KCC2 to modulate GABA functional switch. Therefore, NL2 may serve as a master regulator in balancing excitation and inhibition in the brain.  The gene that encodes NL2 is called NLGN2 (neuroligin 2).  Dysfunction in gene NLGN2 is known to occur in both autism and schizophrenia (adult onset autism).

Conclusion

We came full circle back to Bumetanide and Clonazepam as most likely the safest and most effective therapy to adjust the E/I (excitatory/inhibitory) balance in autism. KCCI agonists do not seem to exist.  The bicarbonate exchanger agonist Acetazolamide/Diamox is another common diuretic and I see no reason why it would not also be effective, but we would then affect bicarbonate levels.  Since these ions play a role in controlling pH levels, I think we might risk seeing some unintended effects.  We know that Bumetanide is safe in long term use.  We know that all diuretics that change chloride level within the cell and will affect epilepsy; so it is a case of “better the devil you know”. 

I finally understood exactly why tiny dose of Clonazepam are effective and how this fits in with the changes the Bumetanide has produced.  Thankfully, such tiny doses are free of the typical side effects expected from benzodiazepines.  One tablet lasts 10 days.

It also answers somebody else’s question about starting with Clonazepam before the Bumetanide.  If you did that you might well make things much worse, you would magnify the unwanted excess brain cell firing.  Once you added bumetanide things would then reverse and brain cell firing would be inhibited.

I rather like the parallel with neuropathic pain, the other condition we looked at with reduced KCC2 transporter function, the researchers there proposed the combination of a diuretic (Acetazolamide) to lower cellular chloride (via exchanger AE3) and a benzodiazepine (Midazolam) as a positive allosteric modulator.  This is extremely similar to Ben Ari’s bumetanide (diuretic affecting transporter NKCC1) plus Catterall’s tiny doses of clonazepam (benzodiazepine) as a positive allosteric modulator.

As for epilepsy and bumetanide, we know that bumetanide has different effects on different types of autism. It seems plausible that people with autism might tend to have the same type of epilepsy.  In any case Monty, aged 11 with ASD, does not have epilepsy/seizures and I suspect taking bumetanide has decreased the chance he ever will.  Of course I cannot prove this, it is just conjecture.