The common form of Leucovorin Calcium is for
injection, but it exists in
tablet form. Maybe another opportunity for intra-nasal delivery?
As pointed out by Tyler, Richard Frye
has published his trial on the effect of mega-dose folinic acid in children with autism and language impairment.
FRAA (folate receptor-αautoantibody) status was predictive of response to
treatment. This means that people who
are FRAA positive are likely to really benefit from folinic acid treatment.
There are different types of folinic acid. Dr Frye uses Calcium Leucovorin (Calcium Folinate), which is used in chemotherapy. It is given by intramuscular
injection or orally.
Dr Frye
uses the oral form.
Folinic
acid should be distinguished from folic acid (vitamin B9). However, folinic acid is a vitamer for folic acid, and has the full vitamin activity of this vitamin.
The dose
is huge by normal standards of vitamin B9. It was 2 mg/ kg per day (maximum 50 mg per
day) in two equally divided doses with half of the target dose given during the
first 2 weeks.
Biomarkers
Two folate-related
biomarkers were investigated. FRAA titers, both blocking and binding, were
analyzed. Plasma free
reduced-to-oxidized glutathione redox ratio was determined. Folate-related vitamins and minerals
were measured. Serum total folate and vitamin B12 were measured
Of 93
children with ASD, 60% and 44% were positive for blocking and
binding FRAAs, respectively.
We sought to determine
whether high-dose folinic acid improves verbal communication in children with
non-syndromic autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and language impairment in a
double-blind placebo control setting. Forty-eight children (mean age 7 years 4 months; 82% male)
with ASD and language impairment were randomized to receive 12 weeks of
high-dose folinic acid (2 mg kg−1 per
day, maximum 50 mg per day; n=23) or placebo (n=25).
Children were subtyped by glutathione and folate receptor-αautoantibody (FRAA) status. Improvement in verbal
communication, as measured by a ability-appropriate standardized instrument,
was significantly greater in participants receiving folinic acid as compared
with those receiving placebo, resulting in an effect of 5.7 (1.0,10.4)
standardized points with a medium-to-large effect size (Cohen’s d=0.70).
FRAA status was predictive of response to treatment. For FRAA-positive
participants, improvement in verbal communication was significantly greater in
those receiving folinic acid as compared with those receiving placebo,
resulting in an effect of 7.3 (1.4,13.2) standardized points with a large
effect size (Cohen’s d=0.91), indicating that folinic acid treatment may
be more efficacious in children with ASD who are FRAA positive. Improvements in
subscales of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, the Aberrant Behavior
Checklist, the Autism Symptom Questionnaire and the Behavioral Assessment
System for Children were significantly greater in the folinic acid group as
compared with the placebo group. There was no significant difference in adverse
effects between treatment groups. Thus, in this small trial of children with
non-syndromic ASD and language impairment, treatment with high-dose folinic
acid for 12 weeks resulted in improvement in verbal communication as compared
with placebo, particularly in those participants who were positive for FRAAs.
Separate analyses were conducted for each
biomarker of folate metabolism (Table 2A). In general, improvement in verbal communication was significantly
greater in participants on folinic acid as compared with those on placebo for
participants with abnormal folate metabolism (i.e., FRAA positive, low glutathione
redox ratio). For
participants with biomarkers indicating more normal folate metabolism (i.e.,
FRAA negative, high glutathione redox ratio) improvement in verbal
communication was not significantly different between groups.
This study suggests that FRAAs predict response
to high-dose folinic acid treatment. This is consistent with the notion that
children with ASD and FRAAs may represent a distinct subgroup.61 Other
factors such as genetic polymorphisms in folate-related genes or mitochondrial
dysfunction may be important in determining treatment response but were not
examined in this study. When methylcobalamin was combined with folinic acid,
improvement in communication as well as glutathione redox status was found.48 Indeed,
future studies will be needed to define factors that predict response to
treatment, investigate optimal dosing and help understand whether other
compounds could work synergistically with folinic acid.
Conclusion
This
study, and previous ones, suggest that > 50% of people tested have what Frye
is calling positive Folate Receptor
Antibody Status. This combined with oxidative
stress, as measured by low glutathione
redox ratio, looks a like a good predictor of who will benefit from Calcium
Folinate.
Clearly
using tablets, as opposed to the usual injections, means that less of the
folinic acid actually reaches the brain. As was discussed in an earlier post, there are other forms of folate, like Metafolin, that are OTC.
Can
Metafolin perform the same function as Calcium Leucovorin?
It would
be useful to know how much Metafolin = 2 mg/ kg of Calcium Leucovorin.
The
only way to find out would be to ask someone taking Calcium Leucovorin.
“Metafolin® is a proprietary ingredient directly usable by the human
organism, involved in lowering homocysteine blood levels, and the only form of folate able to
cross the blood-brain barrier. In addition, Metafolin® does not mask a
vitamin B12-deficiency and presents no risk of an
accumulation of unmodified folic acid in the body.”
I suppose readers will now want to measure Folate Receptor Antibody (FRA) status and look for Calcium Leucovorin. Our regular reader Roger may want to give his insights; perhaps he wants to see if Metafolin can do the job of Calcium Leucovorin?
Any side effects, Roger, after long term use of Calcium Leucovorin?