Once anyone starts to make claims that
some autism is treatable, people respond in different ways. Those applying what has always been taught
in medical school, that autism is untreatable, will either think you are making it all up, or worse, you are
some evil person taking advantage of parents in emotional distress.
The very few people who read the research
about things like metabolic errors and intracellular signaling may well take a
different view. Also the oncology/cancer researchers who themselves think about
sub-types of disease that are induced by specific signaling pathways (like RAS-induced
cancers for example), may well see the sense in experimentation like that in this blog.
Medicine does indeed say that autism,
Down Syndrome and ID/MR are untreatable; however current science does not
support this. Your local doctor applies medicine;
he is likely totally out of his depth when it comes to where science is in 2016.
My posts are just my take on the
science, I am well aware that some clever neurologists have
looked at this blog and think it is all fantasy. The doctors who have a child with autism and read this blog tend
to look from a different perspective and with a much more open mind. Once you find one therapy that is truly
effective, bumetanide in our case, then there can be no turning back.
There are all kinds of diets, supplements and therapies promoted by various people, I wish them all well.
The problem any future science-based autism clinicians will have is that they inevitably get mixed up with other types. In the US they already go to the same autism conferences, which surprises me. People then think, "Oh well if Professor X is here from Ivy League college Y, then everyone must be legit". Big mistake. You need to be on really top form to separate out all the pseudoscience, and on occasion you may get it wrong.
The problem any future science-based autism clinicians will have is that they inevitably get mixed up with other types. In the US they already go to the same autism conferences, which surprises me. People then think, "Oh well if Professor X is here from Ivy League college Y, then everyone must be legit". Big mistake. You need to be on really top form to separate out all the pseudoscience, and on occasion you may get it wrong.
Probiotics
I used to be a skeptic of probiotic bacteria,
that is until I was prescribed some little glass vials about a dozen years
ago. I had some side effect from an
antibiotic prescribed for an ear infection.
I still recall the ENT doctor calling out (not in English) and asking
what to prescribe for the GI side effects.
When I took his prescription to the pharmacy I received a pack of glass
vials and a small saw blade. You used
the saw to cut the neck of the vial then you added water to the white fungus
growing in the vial and poured into a glass of water, which you then drank.
It most definitely worked.
Even today when I tell my doctor
relatives in the UK that probiotics work wonders for diarrhea, all I get is strange
looks.
So I am already sold on the fact that
probiotic bacteria can do great things for stomach problems.
I spoke to a friend in Denmark this
week who has been ill much of the year and finally his problems have been
diagnosed as stemming from Ulcerative Colitis.
His first symptom was actually a blood clot. It turns out that inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), like ulcerative colitis,
increase your risk of blood clots.
So I told
my friend to read up on VSL#3 and Viviomixx, which do seem to help IBD, and
also to read up on melatonin in the IBD research.
Probiotics and Inflammatory Disease
Looking at immune health more
generally we saw how the probiotic Miyairi 588 is used to produce butyric acid
which can improve immune health. This is
why cost conscious farmers put it in their animal feed to produce healthier,
faster growing animals.
We saw that an alternative is just to
add sodium butyrate to the food. This is
done is both livestock and some humans.
Butyrate is an HDAC inhibitor and so is thought to have epigenetic effects.
Butyrate is an HDAC inhibitor and so is thought to have epigenetic effects.
Probiotics and the Brain
You might be able to convince your
doctor that a probiotic bacterium can be good for your stomach, but would you
convince him that it could be good for the brain?
I must admit I also would like to see
some scientific evidence, beyond anecdotes - even my own anecdotes.
So finally today’s featured scientific
study:-
There is increasing, but largely indirect,
evidence pointing to an effect of commensal gut microbiota on the central
nervous system (CNS). However, it is unknown whether lactic acid bacteria such
as Lactobacillus rhamnosus could have a direct effect on
neurotransmitter receptors in the CNS in normal, healthy animals. GABA is the
main CNS inhibitory neurotransmitter and is significantly involved in
regulating many physiological and psychological processes. Alterations in central
GABA receptor expression are implicated in the pathogenesis of anxiety and
depression, which are highly comorbid with functional bowel disorders. In this work, we show that
chronic treatment with L.
rhamnosus (JB-1) induced
region-dependent alterations in GABAB1b mRNA
in the brain with increases in cortical regions (cingulate and prelimbic) and
concomitant reductions in expression in the hippocampus, amygdala, and locus coeruleus, in
comparison with control-fed mice. In addition, L. rhamnosus (JB-1) reduced
GABAAα2 mRNA expression in the prefrontal
cortex and amygdala, but increased GABAAα2 in
the hippocampus. Importantly, L.
rhamnosus (JB-1) reduced
stress-induced corticosterone and anxiety- and depression-related behavior. Moreover, the neurochemical and
behavioral effects were not found in vagotomized mice, identifying the vagus as
a major modulatory constitutive communication pathway between the bacteria
exposed to the gut and the brain. Together, these findings highlight the
important role of bacteria in the bidirectional communication of the gut–brain
axis and suggest that certain organisms may prove to be useful therapeutic
adjuncts in stress-related disorders such as anxiety and depression.
The study is interesting because it shows
that a bacterium can modify GABA subunit expression in the brain, but when the
vagus nerve is removed the effect is lost.
So it is pretty likely that in humans the vagus nerve is the conduit to the brain,
as has many times been suggested, but here we have some pretty conclusive supporting
evidence.
For a less science heavy explanation
of the study:-
Belly bacteria boss the brain
Gutmicrobes can change neurochemistry and influence behavior
I did a post about the vagus nerve a
while back and there is an easy to read article here:-
Viva vagus: Wandering nerve could lead to range of therapies
My old posts:-
The Vagus Nerve and Autism
Cytokine Theory of Disease & the Vagus Nerve
Conclusion
Individual
GI bacteria have very specific effects.
In people with neurological dysfunctions the possibility genuinely exists
to delivery therapies to brain via the gut.
This might have been seen as pseudoscience a decade ago, but now it is part of
science, but not yet medicine.
Many other clever
things going on in your gut. The long
awaited CM-AT pancreatic enzyme therapy, from a company called Curemark, is now entering its phase 3 trial
(thanks Natasa). Click below.
Blüm is the study of CM-AT, a biologic, for the treatment of Autism.
The Curemark
lady, Joan Fallon, has collected numerous patents regarding various mixtures of
pancreatic enzymes and even secretin.
Secretin was an autism therapy that was written off many years ago, but
is still used by some DAN type doctors.
Some
comments on this blog from parents of kids in the early CM-AT trials are
supportive of its effect.
Pancreatic
enzymes (e.g. Creon) are already used as a therapy for people who lack
pancreatic enzymes and many people with autism have taken them.
Curemark have
never published any of their trial data which annoys at least one of our
medical researcher readers. If you have
so many patents, why not share your knowledge?