Today’s post is about reading books,
which is not one of my favourite pastimes, but it does indeed seem to have
significant benefits, particularly if you have autism.
Monty is now aged 16, but I still
recall the amazement his teachers at school expressed when his 1:1 Assistant
taught him to read (using ABA and endless enthusiasm). Teaching someone who could hardly speak, to read, is no small achievement.
We have also done endless exercises at
home to learn to read, to write, to do maths and of course to speak.
The issue later at junior school was
to what extent Monty understood what he read.
There can be a lot of wishful thinking on the part of the parent.
Fast forward to 2020 and Monty spends
about an hour a day reading a “grown-up” novel.
This was a plan I instigated and again the question arose, how much does
Monty understand and frankly, is there any point in the exercise.
I have no doubt that a decade ago when
Monty was reading aloud, it was like a mechanical process, with little
comprehension going on.
Today, Monty is far more fluent when
writing than speaking, which is a pity, because we all tend to judge people by
what that say.
Having read a growing number of novels
in the past months, Monty’s vocabulary is changing. These are not new words and phrases picked up
from cartoons or songs.
I recently had to get Monty to use a
medical mouthwash, which you are not supposed to swallow. I was explaining to him, “Don’t swallow it,
just swish it around your mouth for one minute. Don’t swallow.” He looked at me
and said “It’s prohibited”. Where did
that come from?
While going for a walk down the hill
where we live, he was repeating his current favourite story about what happens
if scoot down the hill really fast, you will crash into the fence at the
bottom, and cry like a baby. This then
gets extended with an ambulance coming, going to hospital and of course being
made better. This time the story became
even longer and ended up with the boy being “in critical condition”, which was
a totally new embellishment to the story.
So, I no longer have to explain why I
now get Monty to read his book every evening; I do not give him a comprehension
test afterwards. I think the results
speak for themselves.
My original idea was to add a calm
activity that does not involve a TV, phone or computer. He takes it very seriously and sends everyone
away so he can read in peace. He does actually
read aloud, and when gets stuck on a word we can hear him say “try again” and
then he goes back and repeats the sentence.
Fortunately, we have a lot of books at
home; Monty is now reading from his big brother’s collection.
Why try to teach
people with severe autism?
A recurring question that does come up
is “Why bother to teach people with severe autism?”. The answer some people give is “you have to
try”, but for how long?
The hope of course is that some of
this learning will “stick” and the person can move on to the next level
up. This indeed has been the case with
Monty and eventually you end up with knowledge not so different to a typical person.
More often than not, in untreated
severe autism, the learning does not stick and development plateaus at a very low
level. If that happens, then focusing on
functional, living skills is the way to go, forget about going to algebra
classes.
Does Monty need to know about the
Periodic Table in chemistry? Do any of
his NT classmates need to know about it?
Probably not, but it is just like mental aerobics, stretching your brain.
You have to be “teachable” to gain any
benefit from sitting in a regular classroom.
I do think inclusion with an IEP is generally a waste of everyone’s
time. If you cannot follow the class
teacher, you probably should not be in the class.
Where we live there actually is a
publicly funded day care service for disabled school-age children, it does not
pretend to be a school.
The best option is to make unteachable
children more teachable. I think Lovaas
would have claimed that this is what his ABA does, and perhaps it does for a small proportion
of children. I think ABA is a valuable
teaching method, but it cannot overcome biological limitations, if they are
present. The other option is to use
biology to increase cognitive function and skill acquisition; this has worked
for Monty and others.
The Research? Reading and Autism
Someone actually got paid to do a PhD at
Liverpool University in this very subject.
She is a late diagnosed adult with autism, so she is likely researching
herself; her autism is far away from severe childhood autism diagnosed in a
toddler.
We once had a 1:1 classroom assistant
who was clever but pretty clearly “on the spectrum”, it became clear that
having an NT assistant is the only way to go.
People with very mild autism think they understand severe autism but, in
reality, they are the least likely to have a clue. The best assistants are themselves the
complete opposite of autistic.
This new research will explore whether improvements in ToM (Theory of Mind) and self-reflection,
in association with the contemplation of fiction, can translate to ASD. It aims
to develop a reading intervention that can improve 'metarepresentational'
capacity, which means the ability to contemplate and think about mental states.
The funding will help in the development of a pilot study to
determine the type of material that is best to use – poetry or different genres
of literary fiction – and to identify any problems encountered such as
visualisation so that they can be counteracted.
Social understanding
Melissa Chapple, said: "We are seeing more research
suggesting that improved theory of mind and empathy due to fiction literature
can improve well-being in numerous cognitive conditions.
"Over the past year I have been using popular fiction as a
self-intervention to temporarily improve social and emotional understanding of
those with an ASD, as I didn't agree with the typical view that people on the
spectrum can't compute fiction very well.
"My only issue with the intervention was that I couldn't
visualise characters and places, so to counteract that I started assigning
actors' faces and images of real places and found the intervention really
helped.
"That made me want to explore the potential for fiction as
a therapeutic intervention in Autism and Asperger's and to debunk the idea that
fiction isn't compatible with those of us on the spectrum."
Cognitive ability
It is widely acknowledged that ASDs are associated with impaired
social cognitive abilities, such as ToM and empathy deficits, which can result
in patients struggling with social identification and in making friends.
Currently available ASD interventions attempt to reduce the
impact of traits that may compromise wellbeing while enhancing beneficial
individual characteristics. These interventions aim to arm patients with a set
of 'tools' for combating traits that they find problematic.
Applied behaviour analysis (ABA), which uses learning principles
such as reinforcement to increase favourable behaviour, and TEACCH, a
multi-dimensional therapy including cognitive behavioural therapy and skill enhancement, have been found to improve social
communication and cognition in ASD.
The strength of these formal interventions is that they are
believed to be generalisable, in that parents, carers or the individual
themselves can implement the interventions in everyday life for continued benefits.
Potential
As part of the study a number of one-on-one reading aloud
sessions will be conducted using people with an ASD diagnosis. They will then
be interviewed to assess the benefits.
Melissa added: "If effective, an informal and voluntary
literary reading activity would possess the same generalisable benefit of ABA
and TEACCH, by encouraging literary reading in everyday life and by having the
potential for training relatives, friends and/or carers to facilitate the
reading intervention."
I could not find her actual thesis, maybe
she did not finish; but I don’t think we are missing much. Here is an extract from a paper she wrote that
was actually published.
Framework Analysis: Reading and Autism
This small-scale pilot study involved five participants, four
attending a focus group and the fifth taking part in a single one-to-one
interview. All participants were over 18 years of age, fluent in English, and
were current or past students at the University of Liverpool in order to reduce
ethical issues around intellectual vulnerability. The sample included three
participants formally diagnosed with autism, and two who had been referred for
professional assessment. All were current or previous higher education
students, four of the five participants identified as female.
In her “autism sample”, 40% did not
even have an autism diagnosis. They are/were
all university students; they do not have any intellectual disability, but seem
to struggle with the concept of gender. In science, you are biologically either
male or female, it is very simple and you do not get to choose.
It is now remarkably common that
people are referred to as having autism, when they have no such medical
diagnosis, or they have had multiple previous diagnoses, like schizophrenia and
schizoaffective disorder, but they
decide now it is fashionable to say they have autism. US official autism statistics even include "school-diagnosed" autism, that is behavior not troubling enough to warrant asking for a medical assessment. It all looks painfully amateur to me.
I would imagine people with high IQ and
mild autism are often avid readers. In
the case of some males, probably reading science fiction and comics, when not
assembling Lego Star Wars. It only becomes a problem if you read odd things
that are far from what they sell at your local bookstore, now possible thanks
to the internet.
Many people are probably unaware that
a person with autism, as opposed to Asperger’s, may be able to read aloud pages
from a book and yet comprehend absolutely nothing. For them reading does not have much purpose,
cognition needs to be improved.
Common sense
benefits from reading
I think we can revert to common sense;
extensive reading likely improves vocabulary.
Monty’s big brother attributes his wide vocabulary to having been a
prolific reader when he was a young boy.
Extensive Reading: A Stimulant to Improve Vocabulary Knowledge
The results showed that EG (Extensive Reading) at
both levels indicated improvement in their vocabulary learning after the
experiment.
Does extensive reading improve
spelling? It very likely does help, but
Monty was good at spelling anyway. Is
the converse true? Quite possibly; I did not read for fun and I cannot spell.
I thought reading in someone with more
severe autism might affect mood, reduce anxiety and improve patience. We saw a long time ago in this blog that
music, both listening to it and playing it, is beneficial to most people. A
trial even measured the stress hormone cortisol in saliva, after choir
practice.
I do think forcing kids to read
certain types of books at school is totally counter-productive. They should find genres they actually want to
read.
Conclusion
Even if you are not entirely sure how
much is actually comprehended, reading fiction does seem a good addition to the
activity list for a teenager with autism.
I do actually hate feeling the need nowadays
to add “severe” in front of the word autism. In what I consider severe autism,
you would not even be reading simple fairy tales, let alone two hundred-page
novels.
In 2020 most people now think autism
refers to high IQ people, who are just a bit “odd”; like the researcher from
Liverpool University and characters in many recent TV programs. We have the not-so-clever US psychiatrists behind
DSM5 to thank for the loss of Asperger’s, as a much more precise and useful observational
diagnosis.
There actually is the tag #ActuallyAutistic on Twitter, which, for our literary readers, must be an oxymoron. How can a genuinely autistic person possibly use Twitter? Much better to use #ActuallyalittlebitAutistic, or better #ActuallyAspie. The defining end of the ASD spectrum is "Autistic Disorder" and they do not tweet.
The people using the #ActuallyAutistic tag often do have many issues, like being bullied, eating disorders, anxiety, loneliness, gender dysphoria/confusion and even suicide. Very likely many of these issues are treatable.
There actually is the tag #ActuallyAutistic on Twitter, which, for our literary readers, must be an oxymoron. How can a genuinely autistic person possibly use Twitter? Much better to use #ActuallyalittlebitAutistic, or better #ActuallyAspie. The defining end of the ASD spectrum is "Autistic Disorder" and they do not tweet.
The people using the #ActuallyAutistic tag often do have many issues, like being bullied, eating disorders, anxiety, loneliness, gender dysphoria/confusion and even suicide. Very likely many of these issues are treatable.