The first
bacteria is very well researched and recently was shown to increase oxytocin in autism mouse studies. It is available on its
own and this is the product most people I know are using.
The second
bacteria is included in Bio Gaia Gastrus specifically for its additional anti-inflammatory
effects.
Recent
comments on this blog have shown that some people have a negative “histamine-y" reaction to Bio Gaia Gastrus. This is
entirely logical since the mode of action of the second bacteria is to generate
histamine to activate H2 receptors in the gut.
This might sound rather odd since histamine is thought
of as inflammatory, but the researchers working for Bio Gaia have shown that histamine
can produce the opposite effect, suppressing TNF
via Modulation of PKA and ERK Signaling.
Beneficial microbes and
probiotic species, such asLactobacillus reuteri, produce
biologically active compounds that can modulate host mucosal immunity.
Previously, immunomodulatory factors secreted byL. reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 were unknown. A
combined metabolomics and bacterial genetics strategy was utilized to identify
small compound(s) produced byL. reuteri that were TNF-inhibitory. Hydrophilic
interaction liquid chromatography-high performance liquid chromatography
(HILIC-HPLC) separation isolated TNF-inhibitory compounds, and HILIC-HPLC
fraction composition was determined by NMR and mass spectrometry analyses.
Histamine was identified and quantified in TNF-inhibitory HILIC-HPLC fractions.
Histamine is produced from L-histidine via histidine decarboxylase by some
fermentative bacteria including lactobacilli. Targeted mutagenesis of each gene present in the
histidine decarboxylase gene cluster inL. reuteri 6475 demonstrated the involvement of
histidine decarboxylase pyruvoyl type A (hdcA), histidine/histamine antiporter (hdcP), andhdcB in production of the TNF-inhibitory
factor. The mechanism of TNF inhibition byL. reuteri-derived histamine was investigated using
Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)-activated human monocytoid cells. Bacterial histamine suppressed
TNF production via activation of the H2receptor. Histamine fromL. reuteri 6475 stimulated increased levels of
cAMP, which inhibited downstream MEK/ERK MAPK signaling via protein kinase A
(PKA) and resulted in suppression of TNF production by transcriptional
regulation.In summary,
a component of the gut microbiome,L. reuteri, is able to convert a dietary component,
L-histidine, into an immunoregulatory signal, histamine, which suppresses
pro-inflammatory TNF production. The identification of bacterial
bioactive metabolites and their corresponding mechanisms of action with respect
to immunomodulation may lead to improved anti-inflammatory strategies for
chronic immune-mediated diseases.
This may mean that people who respond well to H2 histamine
antagonists (Zantac, Tagamet etc) are unlikely to benefit from Lactobacillus.
reuteriATCC PTA
6475.
It might also mean that people who respond negatively to Bio
Gaia Gastrus might get benefit from H2 histamine antagonists.
It might be worthwhile people trialing the single bacteria Bio
Gaia product (Protectis), if they have a negative reaction to Gastrus.
An
interesting trial of a TNF-α and IL-6 inhibitor in autism has been brought to my attention.It was by Michael Chez, the neurologist from
Sacramento, who has made several appearances on this blog.
By
coincidence, a copy of his book arrived this week.The book is called “Autism and its Medical Management”, Chez is one of the few mainstream doctors who does try and treat
autism.The book is rational, readable
and in no way radical, so you could show it to your family doctor without
upsetting him/her.Chez does particularly focus
on distinguishing regressive from non-regressive autism, as do I. His view is
that it is regressive autism, even if it was regression from slightly
abnormal.The important part is that some
learned skills, like language, were lost sometime after 12 months of age. He believes that regressive autism has a different
basis to non-regressive autism; he has his own ideas about this, but he admits there
is no concrete proof.
The book is
a few years old and Chez has published much work in the intervening few
years.
Lenalidomide, an analogue of
thalidomide, has the potential to invoke significant changes in TNF-α and other
immunomodulatory cytokines.If
thalidomide sounds familiar, it is the drug from the 1950s, that turned out to
be very unsafe for use in pregnant women and around the world 10,000 babies
were born with
malformation of the limbs.
Lenalidomide has been used to
successfully treat both inflammatory disorders and cancers in the past 10
years. There are multiple mechanisms of action.It is extremely expensive, according to NICE:-
“Lenalidomide
25 mg capsules cost £4368 per 21 capsules (excluding VAT; ‘British
national formulary’ [BNF] edition 55). Dosage is continued or modified based
upon clinical and laboratory findings. For example, if lenalidomide is
continued for ten 28-day cycles without dose reduction, the cost would be
£43,680.”
Dr Chez does not mention the cost of Lenalidomide, but he uses a tiny
dose of 2.5 mg; This would cost £20, or $30, a day.This might also explain the small number (7) of
participants in the trial.
“2.2. Drug and Dosing. Lenalidomide 2.5mgs was given daily
for 12 weeks. This low dose was selected to minimize the risk
of adverse effects. In addition, because this was a pilot study,
the goal was to test the lowest dose that could potentially
lead to improvements.”
The drug did reduce TNF-α levels and there were some
behavioral improvements, but nothing dramatic.Perhaps a higher dosage would have had a greater effect?
There
were only seven participants and the data on the seven is not complete; also
the dose of Lenalidomide
was very low.I think it is really only
fair to conclude that the trial is interesting but that a much cheaper drug
would need to be found and tested on a much larger number of participants.
“Despite the limitations, to our knowledge, this open-label study
represents the first attempt to treat autism by specifically targeting elevated
innate inflammatory cytokine levels. Safety monitoring and pharmacokinetic data
were successfully completed during this pilot study and exploratory
observations of clinical and cytokine changes suggest a trend towards
improvement. Correlating treatment outcomes with cytokine level changes may be
a target in future autism spectrum treatment, especially in those with known
maternal or postnatal immunological risk factors. Larger blinded and
placebo-controlled studies assessing cytokine measurement and cytokine-targeted
treatment in autism patients with TNF-α or other inflammatory cytokine
elevation are warranted.”
To his credit, unlike the researchers
in Athens who trialed Neuroprotek in a recent post, Chez went about his pilot
study in a scientific manner and collected both the biological and the behavioral
data. In other words, he measured the
before and after levels of the inflammatory cytokines and the before and after behavioral
rating scales.Well done Dr Chez.
You may be
wondering why, with so many research papers written about autism, so little
progress has been made.It is a very
complex task, but nobody is coordinating it.
How do you
find a Boeing 777 missing somewhere in Asia?Another daunting challenge, but with the right people and resources it can
be done.With the wrong people, it will
prove to be impossible.
Ashwood et
al have documented the level of various inflammatory markers in autism.Very helpfully, they created three groups:
typical children, children with non-regressive autism, and children with
regressive autism.
Table 2, on
the third page, tells us what we need to know.Certain cytokine levels are markedly elevated in regressive autism,
including IL-6 and TNF-alpha.Furthermore,
the difference between the two types of autism is dramatic; rather implying the
existence of two distinct conditions.
So now, I
move on to what could have been an amazingly helpful study, had they spent 1%
more time on it and collected some blood samples and split the kids into
regressive and non-regressive groups.
Last year in
Athens, a study was done using Theoharides’ mix of luteolin and quercetin
flavonoids to look at the effect of mast cell stabilization on behaviour in autism.From recent posts, you will recall that these
flavonoids reduce the level of inflammatory cytokines, histamine and nerve
growth factor, by stabilizing so called mast cells.In effect, the study was looking at the
impact of inhibiting certain cytokines on behaviour in autism.
This sounds
great and just what I wanted to find.Get
40 kids with ASD measure their level of these cytokines/histamine and assess
their behaviour.Give them the cytokine
inhibitor/mast cell stabilizer for six months, measure the levels in their blood and assess the
behaviour again.
Sadly, they
did not bother to take the before and after blood samples and send them downstairs
to the hospital’s laboratory.
So we have a
paper that took years of planning that tells us that the flavonoids do seem to
help; but we do not know exactly why and we cannot correlate improvement in behaviour
with change in cytokine levels.
We have
noted in earlier posts that autism is a dynamic encephalopathyand this may help explain why a therapy that works
in a child aged 10, may be of little help to another child aged 3.Not only are there many sub-types of autism,
but each sub-type is evolving, as the child matures.
None of the
autism drug therapies I have implemented have permanent disease changing
effects, they all seem to work, but the effect is lost once you stop taking
them.Today’s post is about drugs that
you take just once.For a parent trying
to find a drug that works in the sub-type affecting their child, this has a big
advantage.No need to keep trying for
months to see if the drug has any effect.
Perhaps the
most important time to intervene with drug therapy is as soon as possible after
the diagnosis; but with what?
In an
earlier post on trying to get a non-verbal child to talk, I suggested the use
of corticosteroids to arrest on-going neuroinflammation.Drugs like prednisone are potent, but they these
have nasty side-effects if used long term. In that post, Dr Michael Chez, an
eminent neurologist from Sacramento, was upbeat on their potential as immunomodulators.We will
refer back to him in this post as well.
In this post
I will give more background about the role of a cytokine called Interleukin 6,
or just IL-6, in autism.You will see
how science can both create a mouse with autism using IL-6 and reverse it again
using IL-6 antibodies.
We will also
look at another cytokine calledTNF-ᾳ and see how a single dose of a TNF-ᾳ
inhibitor can improve chronic neurological dysfunction following a stroke, TBI
and indeed autism.It is effective even
a decade after the original traumatic event.
Both the
IL-6 and TNF-ᾳ drugs are developed for arthritis and these drugs cost tens of
thousands of dollars a year, but in the case of neurological conditions they may
have a disease-changing effect when used just once. Remarkably, both drugs are
already approved for long term use in very young children with Juvenile
Idiopathic Arthritis.
Why am I interested in Cytokine
inhibition?
My very
first attempt to reduce neuroinflammation in Monty, aged 10 with ASD, was a
very surprising, but resounding success.That followed my research into cytokine storms and statins.I know it works, because when I stop the statin,
the very same behavioural improvement is lost in a day or so.
Are there
randomized trials of atorvastatin in autism? Sadly, not; but it is a safe
intervention that works in my mouse model.
Are there
further potential benefits from such therapy? Quite possibly, but higher doses
of statins have side effects.
We saw in
recent posts that PEA, quercetin and luteolin also inhibit pro-inflammatory
cytokines.Is there a potential
disease-changing therapy?We will only
find one, if we look.
The Cytokine IL-6 and Autism
Thanks to Dr
Wei, we have some excellent research linking specifically the cytokine IL-6 to
autism.He suggests that elevated levels
of IL-6 may cause much of the damage in autism and he went as far as to prove
it in a mouse model.
A single
injection of IL-6 into a pregnant mouse, produced a mouse pup with social
deficits.When the mother received a
dose of IL-6 antibodies the resulting mouse pup has normal behaviour.Humans are not mice, but we do already know
from Ashwood and others that people with ASD have elevated levels of IL-6 and
in particular those people with regressive autism.
Autism
is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impairments in social
interaction, deficits in verbal and non-verbal communication, and repetitive
behavior and restricted interests. Emerging evidence suggests that aberrant
neuroimmune responses may contribute to phenotypic deficits and could be
appropriate targets for pharmacologic intervention. Interleukin (IL)-6, one of
the most important neuroimmune factors, has been shown to be involved in
physiological brain development and in several neurological disorders. For
instance, findings from postmortem and animal studies suggest that brain IL-6 is an important mediator of
autism-like behaviors. In this review, a possible pathological mechanism
behind autism is proposed, which suggests that IL-6 elevation in the brain,
caused by the activated glia and/or maternal immune activation, could be an
important inflammatory cytokine response involved in the mediation of
autism-like behaviors through impairments of neuroanatomical structures and
neuronal plasticity. Further
studies to investigate whether IL-6 could be used for therapeutic interventions
in autism would be of great significance.
Background: Although the
cellular mechanisms responsible for the pathogenesis of autism are not
understood, a growing number of studies have suggested that localized
inflammation of the central nervous system (CNS) may contribute to the
development of autism. Recent evidence shows that IL-6 has a crucial role in
the development and plasticity of CNS.
Methods: Immunohistochemistry
studies were employed to detect the IL-6 expression in the cerebellum of study
subjects. In
vitro adenoviral
gene delivery approach was used to over-express IL-6 in cultured cerebellar
granule cells. Cell adhesion and migration assays, DiI labeling, TO-PRO-3
staining and immunofluorescence were used to examine cell adhesion and
migration, dendritic spine morphology, cell apoptosis and synaptic protein
expression respectively.
Results: In this study, we found that IL-6 was significantly
increased in the cerebellum of autistic subjects. We investigated how IL-6 affects
neural cell development and function by transfecting cultured mouse cerebellar
granule cells with an IL-6 viral expression vector. We demonstrated that IL-6
over-expression in granule cells caused impairments in granule cell adhesion
and migration but had little effect on the formation of dendritic spines or
granule cell apoptosis. However, IL-6 over-expression stimulated the formation
of granule cell excitatory synapses, without affecting inhibitory synapses.
Conclusions: Our results provide further evidence that aberrant IL-6
may be associated with autism. In addition, our results suggest that the
elevated IL-6 in the autistic brain could alter neural cell adhesion, migration
and also cause an imbalance ofexcitatory and inhibitory circuits. Thus, increased IL-6 expression may
be partially responsible for the pathogenesis of autism.
Abnormal
immune responses have been reported to be associated with autism. A number of
studies showed that cytokines were increased in the blood, brain, and
cerebrospinal fluid of autistic subjects. Elevated IL-6 in autistic brain has been a consistent
finding. However, the mechanisms by which IL-6 may be involved in the
pathogenesis of autism are not well understood. Here we show that mice with
elevated IL-6 in the brain display many autistic features, including impaired
cognitive abilities, deficits in learning, abnormal anxiety traits and
habituations, as well as decreased social interactions. IL-6 elevation caused
alterations in excitatory and inhibitory synaptic formations and disrupted the
balance of excitatory/inhibitory synaptic transmissions. IL-6 elevation also
resulted in an abnormal change in the shape, length and distributing pattern of
dendritic spines. These findings suggest that IL-6 elevation in the brain could
mediate autistic-like behaviors, possibly through the imbalances of neural
circuitry and impairments of synaptic plasticity.
Schizophrenia and autism are thought to
result from the interaction between a susceptibility genotype and environmental
risk factors. The offspring of women who experience infection while pregnant
have an increased risk for these disorders. Maternal immune activation (MIA) in
pregnant rodents produces offspring with abnormalities in behavior, histology,
and gene expression that are reminiscent of schizophrenia and autism, making
MIA a useful model of the disorders. However, the mechanism by which MIA causes
long-term behavioral deficits in the offspring is unknown. Here we show that
the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) is critical for mediating the behavioral and
transcriptional changes in the offspring. A single maternal injection of
IL-6 on day 12.5 of mouse pregnancy causes prepulse inhibition (PPI) and latent
inhibition (LI) deficits in the adult offspring. Moreover, coadministration of
an anti-IL-6 antibody in the poly(I:C) model of MIA prevents the PPI, LI, and
exploratory and social deficits caused by poly(I:C) and normalizes the associated
changes in gene expression in the brains of adult offspring. Finally, MIA in IL-6
knock-out mice does not result in several of the behavioral changes seen in the
offspring of wild-type mice after MIA. The identification of IL-6 as a key
intermediary should aid in the molecular dissection of the pathways whereby MIA
alters fetal brain development, which can shed new light on the
pathophysiological mechanisms that predispose to schizophrenia and autism.
Effects of exogenous cytokines
Our pilot studies indicated that maternal
administration of IL-6, but not IL-1α, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), or IFNγ,
causes PPI deficits in the adult offspring. PPI is the
inhibition of a startle response when the startling stimulus is immediately
preceded by a smaller, nonstartling stimulus of the same modality and is a
measure of sensory-motor gating, attention, and distractibility. PPI deficits are observed in several mental disorders, including
schizophrenia and autism. Furthermore, PPI deficits in the offspring
elicited by maternal influenza infection respond to antipsychotic and
psychomimetic drugs, and the PPI deficit resulting from poly(I:C) MIA is present
in adult but not juvenile rats, mimicking the adult onset of schizophrenia. The changes seen in this very
relevant behavior prompted further study of the effects of maternal IL-6
administration
Thus, a single injection of IL-6 on E12.5 causes deficits in two relevant
behaviors (LI and PPI) in the adult offspring.
Abnormal
behavior in MIA offspring is prevented by maternal treatment with anti-IL-6
antibody
f, In
the social interaction test, control mice show a strong preference for the
social chamber [defined as (percentage of time in social chamber) – (percentage
of time in opposite chamber)], whereas the offspring of poly(I:C)-treated mice
show no such preference. Again,
the deficit is corrected by maternal administration of IL-6 antibody
Tocilizumab /
Actemra
Wei has made
a pretty solid case that IL-6 is implicated in autism and that IL-6 inhibition
could be a very interesting therapy.While we have a range of interventions that can do just that, the
ultimate therapy would be IL-6 antibodies.
This therapy
does actually exist as a recent option in treating arthritis. Tocilizumab,
brand name Actemra, is
an immunosuppressive drug made of humanized monoclonal antibodiesagainst the interleukin-6 receptor
(IL-6R)In 2013 Actemra was approved by the FDA for children
as young as 2 years old, as an ongoing treatment for arthritis.
This drug is
frighteningly expensive and in arthritis you need to keep taking it regularly.
Now let us
look at another related very expensive drug. Etanercept (trade name Enbrel).Enbrel is another immunosuppressive drug for arthritis
, but this time it is not inhibiting IL-6 but rather tumor necrosis factor (TNF).
This drug also treats a condition called psoriasis.There is a case of a 53 year old Italian lady
only partially verbal and by the sound of it, autistic, living with her
mother.She had her psoriasis treated
with Enbrel and suddenly she became social and her speech improved.Now an example of one is definitely
interesting, but it does not prove anything.
But, remember
Dr Chez from Sacramento?Tucked away in
his excellent paper of immunomodulation in autism.
"A single case of repetitive regression, with bouts of inflammatory
colitis in an 8-year-old with regressive autism after age 3, has shown elevated
serum TN alphalevels
and rapid colitis, as well as behavioral and language improvements after injections of etanercept
(unpublished data, personal communication Y. Davies and M. Chez 2008)."
At the time,
I did not pay much attention since who can afford an ongoing therapy costing
tens of thousands of dollars a year?
But, there
is more.
In the US, a
controversial doctor has been treating various chronic neurological
dysfunctions with single dose
etanercept.He was criticized both for
his marketing and the lack of published research to back up his claims.To his credit, he is now publishing his work
and has patented his therapy.
Brain injury from stroke and traumatic
brain injury (TBI) may result in a persistent neuroinflammatory response in the
injury penumbra. This response may include microglial activation and excess
levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF). Previous experimental data suggest that
etanercept, a selective TNF inhibitor, has the ability to ameliorate microglial
activation and modulate the adverse synaptic effects of excess TNF. Perispinal
administration may enhance etanercept delivery across the blood-CSF barrier.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this study was to
systematically examine the clinical response following perispinal
administration of etanercept in a cohort of patients with chronic neurological
dysfunction after stroke and TBI.
METHODS:
After approval by an independent
external institutional review board (IRB), a chart review of all patients with
chronic neurological dysfunction following stroke or TBI who were treated
open-label with perispinal etanercept (PSE) from November 1, 2010 to July 14,
2012 at a group medical practice was performed.
RESULTS:
The treated cohort included 629
consecutive patients. Charts of 617 patients following stroke and 12 patients
following TBI were reviewed. The mean age of the stroke patients was 65.8 years
± 13.15 (range 13-97). The mean interval between treatment with PSE and stroke
was 42.0 ± 57.84 months (range 0.5-419); for TBI the mean interval was 115.2 ±
160.22 months (range 4-537). Statistically significant improvements in motor
impairment, spasticity, sensory impairment, cognition,
psychological/behavioural function, aphasia and pain were noted in the stroke
group, with a wide variety of additional clinical improvements noted in
individuals, such as reductions in pseudobulbar affect and urinary
incontinence. Improvements in multiple domains were typical. Significant
improvement was noted irrespective of the length of time before treatment was
initiated; there was evidence of a strong treatment effect even in the subgroup
of patients treated more than 10 years after stroke and TBI. In the TBI cohort,
motor impairment and spasticity were statistically significantly reduced.
DISCUSSION:
Irrespective of the methodological
limitations, the present results provide clinical evidence that stroke and TBI
may lead to a persistent and ongoing neuroinflammatory response in the brain
that is amenable to therapeutic intervention by selective inhibition of TNF,
even years after the acute injury.
CONCLUSION:
Excess TNF contributes to chronic neurological,
neuropsychiatric and clinical impairment after stroke and TBI. Perispinal
administration of etanercept produces clinical improvement in patients with
chronic neurological dysfunction following stroke and TBI. The therapeutic
window extends beyond a decade after stroke and TBI. Randomized clinical trials
will be necessary to further quantify and characterize the clinical response.
Now I am
fully aware that author, Dr Tobinick, has
got into trouble with the Medical Board of California for
his marketing approach.Here is a link
for those interested.This does not mean
his off-label use of etanercept is without merit.
Etanercept (trade name Enbrel) is a biopharmaceutical that
treats autoimmune diseases by interfering with tumor necrosis factor (TNF; a soluble
inflammatory cytokine) by acting as a TNF
inhibitor. It has U.S. F.D.A. approval to treat rheumatoid,
juvenile rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis, plaque
psoriasis and ankylosing spondylitis. TNF-alpha is the
"master regulator" of the inflammatory (immune) response in many
organ systems. Autoimmune diseases are caused by an overactive immune response.
Etanercept has the potential to treat these diseases by inhibiting TNF-alpha.
Other
comorbidities
You might view arthritis and psoriasis as as being
related rather than being comorbid with autism.Are there other comorbid conditions where anti-cytokine therapy is used?
One example is Irritable Bowel Disease
(IBD), where several anti-TNF-alpha drugs have been shown to be effective and
are widely prescribed.IBD includes
ulcerative colitis (UC) and the more severe Crohn’s disease.UC does appear to be comorbid with autism and
indeed UC itself does seem to be associated with mild autistic behaviours.You will find adults with UC debating whether
or not they have Asperger’s.
Here is a short video on anti-TNF
therapy in IBD.
The complete set of video on IBD can
be found here:-
For those scientists among you here is
a full paper on this subject:-
I am surprised that nobody has sought to do even a very small trial
of Etanercept/Enbrel or Tocilizumab/Actemra in autism. These potent
immunomodulatory drugs can have side effects with long term use, but the case
reports suggest that a single dose can be disease changing in neurological
conditions, like autism.
In all likelihood only a single dose would be needed, so you
really would not need the usual years of delay to complete a trial.There is a lot of interest in GH and IGF-1
therapy in autism, which both require ongoing injections. To trial Etanercept
and Tocilizumab would be so easy, in comparison.
Because the mechanism of action is fully understood, and IL-6 and TNF-ᾳ are easy to measure, it would later
be possible to identify the people most likely to benefit from the cytokine
lowering therapy.Quite possibly it
would be people with regressive autism who would benefit most, since they have
the highest level of inflammatory markers, as highlighted by Ashwood.
If indeed
the therapy worked, it is not going to be cheap; but at least it would be a
one-off cost of $1,000 to $2,000, rather than a monthly cost as in severe
arthritis.
I think our
new friend Dr Wei would favour Tocilizumab/Actemra. If you live in
California, Dr Tobinick
would be the one to ask about Etanercept/Enbrel, but it won’t be
cheap.
If medicine
was a true science, we would have longitudinal autism studies that showed the
level of inflammatory cytokines over time.Then we would be able to say, for example, when regression occurs there
is acute neuroinflammation with a spike in IL-6,TNF-ᾳ and other cytokines.
Perhaps this
inflammation does some long term damage that might be halted with immediate immunomodulatory
therapy.If the data did show this, we
could look for correlations between later behavioral improvement and falling
level in inflammatory cytokines.
In children with
regressive autism and who do not improve much, do the inflammatory cytokines
stay at high levels?Are the behavioral
problems caused by the current level of inflammatory cytokines, or is the
problem caused by the long term damage the cytokines already caused?With data, all these questions could be
answered. Without data it is just conjecture.
All you need
to do this research are regular blood samples.The tests themselves are cheap.Then
you could compare cheap immunomodulatory therapy using steroids versus the
expensive arthritis injections used one-off.
Amyloid may
sound like someone’s name, but in fact it is something rather sinister and is related
to many brain disorders.It appears that,
at least in severe cases, they may be implicated in autism, or least the
precursor is.
Proteins
that are normally soluble undergo a process called amyloidosis, which makes
them insoluble and allows deposits to accumulate in various organs, including
the brain.There are many known
examples, including Alzheimer’s and Mad
Cow Disease (Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease).A number of years ago there was a huge public
health scare in the UK, when humans were affected by Mad Cow Disease, after
eating the brains of cows in processed food.
Symptoms vary widely, depending upon where in the body
amyloid deposits accumulate. Amyloidosis may be inherited or acquired.
The precursor to amyloid is naturally called Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP).
APP exists in all of us and is not necessarily
bad.Its function is not fully
understood (see later in this post).
Alzheimer’sAutism
Affects female > MmaleAffects
male > female
Brain atrophyMacrocephaly
(enlarged brain in child)
Amyloid plaques
Degenerative Decline
followed by stable
High αβ, low sAPPα High
sAPPα, low αβ
Amyloid
Precursor Protein (APP)
The gene related to Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP),
was only identified in 1987 and the biology surrounding it is only very
partially understood.Much of the experimental
work is related to Alzheimer’s, but some of these researchers are also looking
at implications for autism.
For the bold, here is a very recent paper on APP:-
APP
metabolites follow nonamyloidgenic pathway (i.e., high sAPP, sAPPα, low Aβ 40)
in brain tissue of children with autism, compared to age matched controls
Here is the data:-
For those of you who want to read a full paper by the
same authors from Indianapolis, here it is:-
Biologists do make their work sound very complicated;
generally it is the terminology that may make it look unintelligible on first
reading.Just read it again and look up the
confusing terms.They also seem to have up
to 5 different names for the same molecule.
Compared to other areas of science like Fluid Mechanics, which
I had to study, and Wikipedia rather understated describes as “Fluid mechanics
can be mathematically complex”, biology
is just a lot of knowledge; none is really intellectually challenging, at least
not until the amyloids start growing.
Just use the amazingly up to date resources of Wikipedia.
Aβ=beta amyloid= amyloid
β-peptideThe most common isoforms are Aβ40
and Aβ42
βAPP
= β-amyloid
precursor protein = amyloid-β precursor protein= AβPP
sAPPα =soluble APPα = soluble amyloid
precursor protein α
Gamma secretase can cleave APP in any of multiple sites
to generate a peptide from 39 to 42 amino acids long.
Generation of the 42 Aβ (amyloid β-peptides) that
aggregate in the brain of Alzheimer's patients requires two sequential
cleavages of APP.Extracellular cleavage
of APP by β-secretase (BACE)
creates a soluble extracellular fragment and a cell membrane-bound fragment
referred to as C99. Cleavage of C99 within its transmembrane domain by γ-secretase
releases the intracellular domain of APP and produces Aβ (amyloid-β).
However a single residue mutation in APP reduces the
ability of β-secretase to
cleave it to produce amyloid-beta and reduces the risk of Alzheimers and other
cognitive declines.
Inhibitors of amyloid deposition include the enzymes
responsible for the production of extracellular amyloid such as β-secretase and γ-secretase inhibitors.Currently the γ-secretase inhibitors are in clinical
trials as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease.
Although the native biological role of APP is of obvious
interest to Alzheimer's research, thorough understanding has remained elusive.
Synaptic formation and repair
The most-substantiated role for APP is in synaptic
formation and repair; its expression is upregulated during neuronal
differentiation and after neural injury. Roles in cell signalling, long-term
potentiation, and cell adhesion have been proposed and supported by as-yet
limited research. In particular, similarities in post-translational processing
have invited comparisons to the signaling role of the surface receptor protein Notch.
APP knockout mice are viable and have relatively minor
phenotypic effects including impaired long-term potentiation and memory loss
without general neuron loss. On the other hand, transgenic mice with
upregulated APP expression have also been reported to show impaired long-term
potentiation.
The logical inference is that because Aβ accumulates
excessively in Alzheimer's disease its precursor, APP, would be elevated as
well. However, neuronal cell bodies contain less APP as a function of their
proximity to amyloid plaques. The data indicate that this deficit in APP
results from a decline in production rather than an increase in catalysis. Loss
of a neuron's APP may affect physiological deficits that contribute to
dementia.
Iron export
A different perspective on Alzheimer's is revealed by a
mouse study that has found that APP possesses ferroxidase activity similar to ceruloplasmin,
facilitating iron export through interaction with ferroportin;
it seems that this activity is blocked by zinc trapped by accumulated Aβ in
Alzheimer's. It has been shown that a single nucleotide polymorphism in
the 5'UTR of
APP mRNA can disrupt
its translation.
The hypothesis that APP has ferroxidase activity in its
E2 domain and facilitates export of Fe(II) is possibly incorrect since the
proposed ferroxidase site of APP located in the E2 domain does not have
ferroxidase activity.
Hormonal regulation
The amyloid-β precursor protein (AβPP) and all associated
secretases are expressed early in development and plays a key role in the endocrinology of reproduction – with
the differential processing of AβPP by secretases regulating human embryonic stem cell (hESC) proliferation as well as their differentiation into neural precursor
cells (NPC). The pregnancy hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)
increases AβPP expression and hESC proliferation while progesterone
directs AβPP processing towards the non-amyloidogenic pathway, which promotes
hESC differentiation into NPC.
AβPP and its cleavage
products do not promote the proliferation and differentiation of post-mitotic
neurons; rather, the overexpression of either wild-type or mutant AβPP in
post-mitotic neurons induces apoptotic death following their re-entry into the cell cycle.
It is postulated that the loss of sex steroids (including progesterone) but the
elevation in luteinizing hormone, the adult equivalent of
hCG, post-menopause
and during andropause
drives amyloid-β production and re-entry of post-mitotic neurons into the cell
cycle.
Arthritis
Recently, amyloid precursor protein (APP) origin was
demonstrated with arthritogenic animals. The source noted is breakdown of
immune complexes, where the amyloid aggregates are left degraded and bind
together to form coil like structures that are not reabsorbed. Also, it induces
secondary inflammation, which may cause local damage.
ADAM17
ADAM17 is understood to be involved in the processing of
tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) at the surface
of the cell. This process, which is also known as 'shedding', involves the
cleavage and release of a soluble ectodomain from membrane-bound pro-proteins
(such as pro-TNF-α), and is of known physiological importance. ADAM17 was the
first 'sheddase' to be
identified, and is also understood to play a role in the release of a diverse
variety of membrane-anchored cytokines, cell adhesion molecules, receptors,
ligands and enzymes.
Conclusion
Even though it does sound complicated, there are some
conclusions.
Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP)
can either be processed towards so-called amyloidogenic pathways in the brain
that lead to Alzheimer’s, or it can follow so-called non-amyloidogenic pathways,
as appears to be the case in autism.The
direction taken seems to depend on α,β and γ–secretases, which are themselves regulated by neurotransmitters
and other signalling molecules.
But why are there elevated
levels of APP in autism?
As is often the case in autism research, some are
thinking biomarker and some are thinking about therapeutic interventions.I am with the latter.
By the way,
now we have dealt with Amy, what about Adam? (the final chart above)
Functional ADAM17 has been documented to be expressed in
the human colon, with increased activity in the colonic mucosa of patients with
ulcerative colitis, a main form of inflammatory bowel disease.But remember, that paper by Wakefield was retracted
and so there should not be evidence linking autism with colitis. Tell Adam to keep quiet.
ADAM17 = ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17= TACE= (tumor
necrosis factor-α-converting enzyme) = TNF α-converting enzyme TNF are a group of cytokines that cause cell death.