UA-45667900-1
Showing posts with label Vitamin D. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vitamin D. Show all posts

Thursday, 22 June 2023

Autism Research Merry-go-round Keeps Turning

 


Today’s post again shows that many issues raised in previous posts keep on coming back  is that good news? Only you can decide.

I start with the “old chestnut” (English idiom to imply “a tired old story”) of the Autism Tsunami. 

Then we see what has come up in the world of autism interventions in the research in the last 3 weeks, most of which regular readers will already be aware of.

·        Autism Tsunami – real or not?

·        Vitamin D

·        Bumetanide

·        Ibudilast

·        Niclosamide

·         Non-invasive brain stimulation

·         Simvastatin 

I noted the research about autism incidence coming from Northern Ireland because it was published in the Belfast News Letter.  These days it has a tiny subscription, but I am one of those who know it is the world's oldest English-language general daily newspaper still in publication, having first been printed in 1737. In 1972 a bomb warning was called in to the paper's office and, as people evacuated, an explosion went off nearby killing several people and injuring many more. Back in the early 1990s, when some people in Northern Ireland were still blowing up others with bombs, I made a visit to Northern Ireland to meet the management of this newspaper. 

Their recent article on autism incidence is very well researched considering how only about 8,000 copies are published. Keep up the good work!

Idea that 5% of all Northern Ireland's children are autistic is 'a fantasy' claims international expert

Professor Laurent Mottron was speaking to the News Letter following a claim that the rate of autism in Northern Ireland is double the rate in the rest of the UK.

Back in 2019 Prof Mottron had authored a report warning about a tsunami of over-diagnosis, saying that soon "the definition of autism may get too vague to be meaningful, trivializing the condition"

“If this trend holds, the objective difference between people with autism and the general population will disappear in less than 10 years," he had said then – and has now indicated that this “fuzziness” is what’s helping swell the numbers in Northern Ireland.

Meanwhile Jill Escher, the president of the National Council on Severe Autism, takes a different view.

She says that evidence indicates the "skyrocketing" rate of autism in Northern Ireland is real, adding: "It boggles my mind that it is not the subject of the highest possible alarm and inquiry."

"One in 20 children in Northern Ireland of school age has a diagnosis of autism," he told MPs.

"[It is] one in 57 in the rest of the UK. The need in Northern Ireland is significantly different."

To put that in perspective, that would mean 5% of Northern Irish children are diagnosed with autism, compared with 1.8% in the rest of the UK.

Prof Mottron, a psychiatrist based at Montreal University, told the News Letter "numbers such as 5% are pure fantasy... these numbers correspond to the part of the general population which has less overt socialisation, which has minimally to do with prototypical autism". 

There is a "current fuzziness of autism diagnosis and over-inclusivity," he said, leading to "a situation of perfect confusion between autistic traits and prototypical autism" (that is, mixing up people who exhibit some tendencies of autistic people with people who actually have the full-blown condition). 

"The scientific 'quasi consensus' would be around 1% everywhere on the planet,” he added.

 

So on one side we have Jill Escher and her NCSA and on the other we have a French/Canadian researcher.  This time Laurent Mottron but in my blog posts I quoted Éric Fombonne.

A paper that was mentioned both in my blog and critiqued by Jill about autism incidence and cost just got retracted.  In reality a better word is “cancelled.”  The 3 authors are very much in the politically incorrect camp of the autism debate.

I was surprised it ever got published.  

Controversial ‘cost of autism’ paper retracted 

Citing methodological issues and undeclared conflicts of interest, an autism journal has retracted a paper that forecast the prevalence and cost of autism.

The retraction note, posted last week, comes two years after Spectrum reported on backlash surrounding the paper, which was published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders in July 2021. A month after publication, the journal added an editor’s note that the study was under investigation because of criticisms of its conclusions. 

“I am glad to see that it was retracted, although at a pace that maybe is a bit frustrating in terms of how long it took. But it was the right choice,” says Brittany Hand, associate professor of health and rehabilitation sciences at Ohio State University in Columbus.

Outside experts who reviewed the paper on the journal’s behalf found that it misrepresented the rise in autism diagnoses and gave “insufficient attention” to some potential causes of the increase, such as improved surveillance and changes to the diagnostic criteria. The authors also used “higher estimates and assumptions that inflated costs,” according to the retraction note.

The authors — Mark Blaxill, Toby Rogers and Cynthia Nevison — all disagree with the journal’s decision, the note also says.

The cancelled paper is here:-

Autism Tsunami: the Impact of Rising Prevalence on the Societal Cost of Autism in the United States

 

I assume Blaxill was the driving force behind all the math, because he is the ex- management consultant, with a son with severe autism that his dad attributes to vaccines.

What I found bizarre in their paper was that they has a prevention scenario, based on what they think has already happened in rich parts of California, where they think autism incidence is falling.  It is not falling, all that is happening is that wealthy Californians are paying for treatment using insurance or their own money, and no longer burdening the State.

The “rainbow” researchers that wanted the paper retracted think that preventing autism is akin to eugenics and Dr Mengele. According to Peter, treating autism is good, while Dr Josef Mengele, byname Todesengel (German: “Angel of Death”) was as bad as you can get.    

Jill Escher and her NCSA think that you cannot prevent autism.  According to Peter, you can both minimize the incidence and severity of autism. 

A bugbear of our reader Tanya is that the NCSA have a pet hate of facilitated communication and in particular the rapid prompting method (RPM). This method worked for Tanya’s son and it opened the door to independent, un-facilitated communication. 

Always keep an open mind.

 

 

 

“our Prevention scenario is based on real rates observed among wealthy white and Asian children in the California DDS.  Severe ASD prevalence has flattened and even declined among these children since birth year 2000, suggesting that wealthy parents have been making changes that effectively lower their children’s risk of developing ASD. The Prevention scenario assumes that these parental strategies and opportunities already used by wealthy parents to lower their children’s risk of ASD can be identified and made available rapidly to lower income children and ethnic minorities, who are currently experiencing the most rapid growth in ASD prevalence”

 

New Paper Makes Case that Autism Tsunami May Threaten American Economy

A major weakness in the analysis was the “Prevention Scenario” in which future costs were projected based on “what might be possible if strategies for reducing ASD risk are identified and addressed in the near future.” As I think everyone knows, at this time there is no way to prevent autism. But the authors use the observation that autism in the DDS is declining among wealthier white families, and thus “suggesting that wealthy parents have been making changes that effectively lower their children’s risk of developing ASD.” No, it’s far more likely that wealthier families are not entering their children into the system because they access services through insurance and school districts instead.

 

Vitamin D as a cause of autism has been discussed for decades.  As the title below puts it – a never-ending story. Our reader Seth Bittker even wrote a paper about it. He later wrote a paper about the use Acetaminophen/Paracetamol in children under two as a risk factor in developing autism. Good work Seth!

 

Maternal Vitamin D deficiency and brain functions: a never-ending story 

A large number of observational studies highlighted the prevalence rates of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in many populations as pregnant women. Vitamin D is well known to have a crucial role in differentiation and proliferation, as well as neurotrophic and neuroprotective actions in brain. Then, this micronutrient can modulate the neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity. Recent results from animal and epidemiological studies indicated that maternal vitamin D deficiency is associated with a wide range of neurobiological disease including autism, schizophrenia, depression, multiple sclerosis or developmental defect. The aim of this review is to provide a state of the art on the effect of maternal vitamin D deficiency on brain functions and development.

4.2.2. Autism

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disease with repetitive behaviour and difficulties in social interaction, communication and learning. Several murine studies and cohorts have demonstrated that early exposure to low levels of VD during pregnancy could be a risk factor for ASD. In 2019, Ali et al. aimed to find out the impact of a maternal VDD on early postnatal, adolescent and adult offspring. By assessing righting reflex and negative geotaxis, they found out that the pups from deficient dams showed a delay in their motor development. P12 rats from deficient females also exhibited increased ultrasound vocalization indicating an alteration in their vocal communication. Adolescent and young adult rats displayed an altered stereotyped repetitive behaviour as they had a reduced digging behaviour. Adolescent rats had less social interaction with longer latency to interact, which was not found in adult rats; however, adults were more hyperactive but showed no anxiety like behaviour.  In another animal study, maternal VDD induced an increase in the vocalizations of the pups accompanied with a decrease in cortical FoxP2, decrease in social behaviour and impaired learning and memory were observed in adult males (Table 1). Using data from the Stockholm youth cohort, Magnusson et al. examined a population of 4-17-year-old children exposed to low levels of VD during gestation and was able to report a positive association between maternal VDD and ASD. Analysing the same cohort, Lee et al. suggested that high levels of VD during pregnancy were associated with a moderate decrease in risk of ASD in the offspring. A prospective study of a multi-ethnic cohort in the Netherlands (generation R study) has also shown an association between maternal mid-gestation VDD and a two-fold increase in the risk of autism in children (Table 2). Interestingly, VD supplementation seems to clinically improve ASD symptoms of affected children.

 

People do associate this blog with Bumetanide.  Yet another paper has been published showing the benefits of this therapy for autism.

 

EEG-based brain connectivity analysis in autism spectrum disorder: Unravelling the effects of bumetanide treatment 


Highlights

 

·        We investigated the nonlinear brain connectivity and topological changes in brain networks of people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) after a three-month course of bumetanide treatment.

·        We found statistically significant differences between pre and post intervention in the connectivity patterns using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).

·        We found that the number of strong connections in response to sad image stimuli seem to be less compared with that of the other two stimuli, especially in the central area.

·        We found that the changes in brain connectivity between pre and post intervention is more significant in response to sad image stimuli.

 

Emerging evidence suggests that cognitive impairment associated with brain network disorders in people with autism could be improved with medications such as bumetanide. However, the extent to which bumetanide is effective in improving brain function in these individuals has not been adequately studied. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the nonlinear brain connectivity and topological changes in brain networks of people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) after a three-month course of bumetanide treatment. We used electroencephalography (EEG) data of nine participants recorded during the face emotion recognition activity in two stages before and after bumetanide treatment. Brain connectivity matrix was calculated using a neural network-based estimator. Graph criteria and statistical tests have been used to determine the effects of bumetanide treatment on children and adolescents with autism. Bumetanide treatment significantly alters the brain connectivity networks based on stimuli type. Differences in brain connectivity related to the sad stimuli are more significant. The most of the significant changes of the strength graph metric was in the occipital electrodes and electrodes related to the right hemisphere. These results suggest that bumetanide may affect effective connectivity and be used a promising treatment for improving social interactions in patients with autism. It also suggests that brain connectivity patterns can be considered as a neural marker to be used in the development of new therapies. 

I have also covered in sometimes painful details the potential to treat autism and increase cognitive function using PDE (Phosphodiesterase) inhibitors. One of our psychiatrist readers is a huge fan of Pentoxifylline and takes it himself.

I was recently asked how to obtain Ibudilast.  It is approved in Japan as an asthma drug. Sometimes it is called Ketas and you can get it from an “International Pharmacy” in Germany/Switzerland if you have a prescription. 

I also wrote about repurposing Roflumilast, which as Daxas is approved all over the world as a therapy for severe asthma (COPD). This drug at a 1/5th dose has been patented as a cognitive enhancer.

 

Phosphodiesterase inhibitor, ibudilast alleviates core behavioral and biochemical deficits in the prenatal valproic acid exposure model of autism spectrum disorder

 

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is categorized as a neurodevelopmental disorder, presenting with a variety of aetiological and phenotypical features. Ibudilast is known to produce beneficial effects in several neurological disorders including neuropathic pain, multiple sclerosis, etc. by displaying its neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. Here, in our study, the pharmacological outcome of ibudilast administration was investigated in the prenatal valproic acid (VPA)-model of ASD in Wistar rats.

Methods

Autistic-like symptoms were induced in Wistar male pups of dams administered with Valproic acid (VPA) on embryonic day 12.5. VPA-exposed male pups were administered with two doses of ibudilast (5 and10 mg/kg) and all the groups were evaluated for behavioral parameters like social interaction, spatial memory/learning, anxiety, locomotor activity, and nociceptive threshold. Further, the possible neuroprotective effect of ibudilast was evaluated by assessing oxidative stress, neuroinflammation (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10) in the hippocampus, % area of Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive cells and neuronal damage in the cerebellum.


Key findings: Treatment with ibudilast significantly attenuated prenatal VPA exposure associated social interaction and spatial learning/memory deficits, anxiety, hyperactivity, and increased nociceptive threshold, and it decreased oxidative stress markers, pro-inflammatory markers (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6), and % area of GFAP-positive cells and restored neuronal damage.

Conclusions

Ibudilast treatment has restored crucial ASD-related behavioural abnormalities, potentially through neuroprotection. Therefore, benefits of ibudilast administration in animal models of ASD suggest that ibudilast may have therapeutic potential in the treatment of ASD.

 

 

I have also written widely about repurposing certain anti-parasite medicines to treat autism. This is not because I think parasites cause autism, it is the secondary modes of action.

 

 

Repurposing Niclosamide as a plausible neurotherapeutic in autism spectrum disorders, targeting mitochondrial dysfunction: a strong hypothesis

 

 

Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are a complex set of neurodevelopmental manifestations which present in the form of social and communication deficits. Affecting a growing proportion of children worldwide, the exact pathogenesis of this disorder is not very well understood, and multiple signaling pathways have been implicated. Among them, the ERK/MAPK pathway is critical in a number of cellular processes, and the normal functioning of neuronal cells also depends on this cascade. As such, recent studies have increasingly focused on the impact this pathway has on the development of autistic symptoms. Improper ERK signaling is suspected to be involved in neurotoxicity, and the same might be implicated in autism spectrum disorders (ASD), through a variety of effects including mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Niclosamide, an antihelminthic and anti-inflammatory agent, has shown potential in inhibiting this pathway, and countering the effects shown by its overactivity in inflammation. While it has previously been evaluated in other neurological disorders like Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease, as well as various cancers by targeting ERK/MAPK, it’s efficacy in autism has not yet been evaluated. In this article, we attempt to discuss the potential role of the ERK/MAPK pathway in the pathogenesis of ASD, specifically through mitochondrial damage, before moving to the therapeutic potential of niclosamide in the disorder, mediated by the inhibition of this pathway and its detrimental effects of neuronal development.

 

Note that in earlier posts I explored RASopathies as potentially treatable types of intellectual disability (ID). We also have RAS-dependent cancers as a discrete treatable sub-type of cancer.


The ERK/MAPK pathway is known to interact with multiple genes that have been implicated in autism, and genome-wide association analysis of the same have supported these findings. As such, a dysregulation of this pathway has been found to result in many CNS disorders, including ASD-related syndromes, in many studies. These syndromes are collectively known as Rasopathies, due to the fact that the affected genes include those encoding for elements which function together with Ras, a G-protein responsible for activating ERKs (Levitt and Campbell 2009; Tidyman and Rauen 2009). It has been found that ASD is linked to the occurrence of many Rasopathies, and there have been multiple reports suggesting the possible relation of ERK/MAPK pathway defects with the incidence of ASD (Vithayathil et al. 2018; Aluko et al. 2021)⁠⁠. Moreover, a detailed study has found that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the ERK/MAPK-related genes are more common in subjects presenting with idiopathic ASD.

 

Niclosamide is an FDA-approved antihelminthic drug which is routinely used to treat tapeworm infections by inhibiting their mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production. In addition, it has long been known to have significant immunomodulating activity, and has been shown to inhibit a number of signaling pathways, including the Wingless-related integration site (Wnt)/β-catenin, nuclear factor kappa B (Nf-κB), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (Chen et al. 2018). However, while these targets are known to be rather well-characterized in terms of the effect that niclosamide has on them, there are also other targets, including the phosphoinositode 3 kinase/Akt (PI3K/Akt) and ERK/MAPK pathways, that are seen to be downregulated by the agent. Hence, given the possible relation of the ERK pathway in autism, there has been interest in the potential role of niclosamide in the management of the prognosis of ASD. This article aims to discuss the possible therapeutic benefit of niclosamide in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders.

 

Now I know that parents like the idea of treating autism with various gadgets you can strap on to your head  things like Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). I must say I liked my old post on Photobiomodulation/cold laser/low level laser therapy.


Epiphany: Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for Autism – seems to work in Havana


From China we have a new round-up paper, but the full text does not yet seem to be ready.

 

Non-invasive brain stimulation for Patient with Autism A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in randomized controlled trials (RCT),providing reference for future research on the same topic.

Methods:Five databases were searched (Pubmed,Web of science,Medline,Embase and Cochrane library) and track relevant references,Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results: Twenty-two references(829 participants) were included. The results of meta analysis showed that, NIBS had positive effects on repetitive and stereotypical behaviors, cognitive function and executive function in autistic patients. Most of the included studies had a moderate to high risk of bias, Mainly because of the lack of blinding of subjects and assessors to treatment assignment, as well as the lack of continuous observation of treatment effects.

Conclusions: Available evidence supports an improvement in some aspects of NIBS in patients with ASD. However, due to the quality of the original studies and significant publication bias, these evidences must be treated with caution. Further large multicenter randomized double-blind controlled trials and appropriate follow-up observations are needed to further evaluate the specific efficacy of NIBS in patients with ASD.


Unfortunately, the Chinese have concluded that most of these studies are not reliable. So no laser for me to go out and buy just yet.

No need to dent your bank balance with the next therapy.  We are back to one of the world's most prescribed and therefore affordable drugs, its Simvastatin (Zocor). 

There is masses of information in this blog about the potential to treat sub-types of autism with Atorvastatin, Simvastatin or Lovastatin. They are each slightly different.

 

Effect of simvastatin on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/TrkB pathway in hippocampus of autism rat model 

Purpose: To study the effect of simvastatin on behavioral performance in a rat model of autism, and its effect on hippocampal brain-derived BDNF-TrkB pathway. 

Methods: Twelve rats with valproic acid (VPA)-induced autism were randomly divided into model group and simvastatin group, while six healthy rats served as normal control group. Rats in the simvastatin group received the drug (5 mg/kg) via i.p. route, while rats in model group and normal control group were injected with equivalent volume of normal saline in place of simvastatin. Capacity for interaction and repetitive stereotyped behavior, as well as results of Morris water maze test were determined for each group. The expressions of BDNF-TrkB proteins were assayed with immunoblotting. 

Results: The frequencies of sniffing normal saline, alcohol and rat urine were significantly higher in model and simvastatin rats than in normal rats, but they were significantly lower in simvastatin-treated rats than in model rats (p < 0.05). There was higher duration of turning, jumping and grooming in the model group and simvastatin group than in the normal rats, but the duration was significantly reduced in simvastatin rats, relative to model rats. Escape latency times was significantly longer in model and simvastatin rats than in controls, but number of target quadrant crossings was significantly reduced. However, escape latency time was lower in simvastatin rats than in model rats, but number of target quadrant crossings was significantly higher. The model and simvastatin rats had down-regulated levels of BDNF and TrkB protein, relative to control rats, but there were markedly higher levels of these proteins in simvastatin-treated rats than in model rats. 

Conclusion: Simvastatin improves the behavioral performance of autistic rats by regulating BDNF/TrkB signal axis. This finding may be useful in the development of new drugs for treating autism.

  

Conclusion

What is the conclusion? Well, I could say give up reading the new research and just read my old posts.  It seems you are not going to miss very much.

Of course, back in the real world, it is true that things do take time to change and after a few decades the leap might be taken from the research to the doctor’s office.

There already is plenty of research on the causes of autism and what steps can be taken by those who want to treat aspects of it.  It is far from a complete picture, but it is enough to get started.  There are no guarantees of success, but if you want 100% certainty you will wait forever.








Wednesday, 8 July 2020

Immune modulatory treatments for autism spectrum disorder


Need a wizard, or your local doctor?

I was intrigued to come across a recent paper on immune modulatory treatments for autism by a couple of doctors from Massachusetts General Hospital for Children.  The lead author has interests in:

·      Autism spectrum disorders
·      Psychopharmacology
·      Developmental Disabilities
·      Williams syndrome
·      Angelman syndrome
·      Down syndrome

Apparently, he is an internationally-recognized expert in the neurobiology and neuropsychopharmacology of childhood-onset neuropsychiatric disorders including autistic disorder.  Sounds promising, hopefully we will learn something new.

The paper is actually a review of existing drugs, with immunomodulatory properties, that have already been suggested to be repurposed for autism. The abstract was not very insightful, so I have highlighted the final conclusions and listed the drugs, by category, that they thought should be investigated further.

All the drugs have already been covered in this blog and have already been researched in autism.

One important point raised in the conclusion relates to when the drugs are used.  Autism is a progressive condition early in life and there are so-called “critical periods” when the developing brain is highly vulnerable.

For example, Pentoxifylline has been found to be most effective in very young children.  This does not mean do not give it to a teenager with autism, it just means the sooner you treat autism the better the result will be.  This is entirely logical.

Some very clever drugs clearly do not work if given too late, for example Rapamycin analogs used in people with TSC-type autism.

Multiple Critical Periods for Rapamycin Treatment to Correct Structural Defects in Tsc-1-Suppressed Brain

Importantly, each of these developmental abnormalities that are caused by enhanced mTOR pathway has a specific window of opportunity to respond to rapamycin. Namely, dyslamination must be corrected during neurogenesis, and postnatal rapamycin treatment will not correct the cortical malformation. Similarly, exuberant branching of basal dendrites is rectifiable only during the first 2 weeks postnatally while an increase in spine density responds to rapamycin treatment thereafter.  

Back to today’s paper.


The identification of immune dysregulation in at least a subtype ASD has led to the hypothesis that immune modulatory treatments may be effective in treating the core and associated symptoms of ASD. In this article, we discussed how currently FDA-approved medications for ASD have immune modulatory properties.

“Risperidone also inhibited the expression of inflammatory signaling proteins, myelin basic protein isoform 3 (MBP1) and mitogen-activated kinase 1 (MAPK1), in a rat model of MIA. Similarly, aripiprazole has been demonstrated to inhibit expression of IL-6 and TNF-α in cultured primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy adult donors.”

We then described emerging treatments for ASD which have been repurposed from nonpsychiatric fields of medicine including metabolic disease, infectious disease, gastroenterology, neurology, and regenerative medicine, all with immune modulatory potential. Although immune modulatory treatments are not currently the standard of care for ASD, remain experimental, and require further research to demonstrate clear safety, tolerability, and efficacy, the early positive results described above warrant further research in the context of IRB-approved clinical trials. Future research is needed to determine whether immune modulatory treatments will affect underlying pathophysiological processes affecting both the behavioral symptoms and the common immune-mediated medical co-morbidities of ASD. Identification of neuroimaging or inflammatory biomarkers that respond to immune modulatory treatment and correlate with treatment response would further support the hypothesis of an immune-mediated subtype of ASD and aid in measuring response to immune modulatory treatments. In addition, it will be important to determine if particular immune modulating treatments are best tolerated and most effective when administered at specific developmental time points across the lifespan of individuals with ASD.


Here are the drugs they listed:-

1.     Metabolic disease

Spironolactone
Pioglitazone
Pentoxifylline

Spironolactone is a cheap potassium sparing diuretic. It has secondary effects that include reducing the level of male hormones and some inflammatory cytokines.

Pioglitazone is drug for type 2 diabetes that improves insulin sensitivity.  It reduces certain inflammatory cytokines making it both an autism therapy and indeed a suggested Covid-19 therapy.

Pentoxifylline is a non-selective phosphodiesterase (PDEinhibitor, used to treat muscle pain.  PDE inhibitors are very interesting drugs with a great therapeutic potential for the treatment of immune-mediated and inflammatory diseases.  Roflumilast and Ibudilast are PDE4 inhibitors that also may improve some autism.  The limiting side effect can be nausea/vomiting, which can happen with non-selective PDE4 inhibitors.

I did try Spironolactone once; it did not seem to have any effect.  It is a good match for bumetanide because it increases potassium levels.

I do think that Pioglitazone has a helpful effect and there will be another post on that.

PDE inhibitors are used by readers of this blog. Maja is a fan of Pentoxifylline, without any side effects. Roflumilast at a low dose is supposed to raise IQ, but still makes some people want to vomit. The Japanese drug Ibudilast works for some, but nausea is listed as a possible side effect.


2.     Infectious disease

Minocycline
Vancomycin
Suramin

Minocycline is an antibiotic that crosses in to the brain.  It is known to stabilize activated microglia, the brain’s immune cells.  It is also known that tetracycline antibiotics are immunomodulatory.

Vancomycin is an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections, if taken orally it does not go beyond the gut.  It will reduce the level of certain harmful bacteria including Clostridium difficile.

Suramin is an anti-parasite drug that Dr Naviaux is repurposing for autism, based on his theory of cell danger response.
  

3.     Neurology

Valproic acid

Valproic acid is an anti-epileptic drug.  It also has immunomodulatory and HDAC effects, these effects can both cause autism when taken by a pregnant mother and also improve autism in some people.

Valproic acid can have side effects. Low dose valproic acid seems to work for some people. 


4.     Gastroenterology

Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT)

FMT is currently used to treat recurrent Clostridium difficile infection and may also be of benefit for other GI conditions including IBD, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and functional GI disorders.

Altered gut bacteria (dysbiosis) is a feature of some autism which then impairs brain function.  Reversing the dysbiosis with FMT improves brain function.  


5.     Oncology

Lenalidomide
Romidepsin
  
Lenalidomide is an expensive anti-cancer drug that also has immunomodulatory effects.

Romidepsin is a potent HDAC inhibitor, making it a useful cancer therapy.  HDAC inhibitors are potential autism drugs, but only if given early enough not to miss the critical periods of brain development. 


6.     Pulmonology

N-acetylcysteine

Many people with autism respond well to NAC. You do need a lot of it, because it has a short half-life.


7.     Nutritional medicine and dietary supplements

Omega-3 fatty acids
Vitamin D
Flavonoids

Nutritional supplements can get very expensive.  In hot climates, like Egypt, some dark skinned people cover up and then lack vitamin D.  A lack of vitamin D will make autism worse.

Some people with mild brain disorders do seem to benefit from some omega-3 therapies.

Flavonoids are very good for general health, but seem to lack potency for treating brain disorders.  Quercetin and luteolin do have some benefits. 


8.     Rheumatology

Celecoxib
Corticosteroids
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)


Celecoxib is a common NSAID that is particularly well tolerated (it affects COX-2 and only marginally COX-1, hence its reduced GI side effects).

NSAIDS are used by many people with autism.

Steroids do improve some people’s autism, but are unsuitable for long term use.  A short course of steroids reduces Covid-19 deaths – a very cost effective therapy.

IVIG is extremely expensive, but it does provide a benefit in some cases. IVIG is used quite often to treat autism in the US, but rarely elsewhere other than for PANS/PANDAS that might occur with autism.


9.     Regenerative medicine

Stem cell therapy

I was surprised they gave stem cell therapy a mention. I think it is still early days for stem cell therapy.


Conclusion

I have observed the ongoing Covid-19 situation with interest and in particular what use has been made of the scientific literature.

There are all sorts of interesting snippets of data. You do not want to be deficient in Zinc or vitamin D, having high cholesterol will make it easier for the virus to enter your cells.  Potassium levels may plummet and blood becomes sticky, so may form dangerous clots. A long list of drugs may be at least partially effective, meaning they speed up recovery and reduce death rates. Polytherapy, meaning taking multiple drugs, is likely to be the best choice for Covid-19.

Potential side effects of some drugs have been grossly exaggerated, as with drugs repurposed for autism.  Even in published research, people cheat and falsify the data. In the case of hydroxychloroquine, the falsified papers were quickly retracted.

The media twist the facts, to suit their narrative, as with autism.  This happens even with Covid-19. Anti-Trump media (CNN, BBC etc) is automatically anti-hydroxychloroquine, and ignores all the published research and the results achieved in countries that widely use it (small countries like China and India). 

Shutting down entire economies when only 5-10% of the population have been infected and hopefully got some immunity, does not look so smart if you are then going to reopen and let young people loose.  They will inevitably catch the virus and then infect everyone else. Permanent lockdown restrictions, if followed by everyone, until a vaccine which everyone actually agreed to take, makes sense and living with the virus makes sense, but anything in between is not going to work. After 3 months without any broad lockdown, and allowing young people to socialize, most people would have had the virus and then those people choosing to shield could safely reemerge. The death rate with the current optimal, inexpensive treatment, as used in India or South Africa is very low, in people who are not frail to start with. Time to make a choice.  Poor people in poor countries cannot afford to keep going into lockdown, they need to eat.

What hope is there for treating a highly heterogeneous condition like autism, if it is not approached entirely rationally and without preconceptions and preconditions?  In a pandemic we see that science does not drive policy and translating science into therapy is highly variable.  The science is there for those who choose to read it.

I frequently see comments from parents who have seen some of the research showing that autism has an inflammatory/auto-immune component.  They ask why this has not been followed up on in the research.  It has been followed up on.  It just has not been acted upon.

Why has it not been acted on?

This missing stage is called “translation”.  Why don’t doctors translate scientific findings into therapy for their patients?

What is common sense to some, is “experimental” to others. “Experimental” is frowned upon in modern medicine, but innovation requires experimentation.

Many people’s severe autism is unique and experimental polytherapy/polypharmacy is their only hope.

The cookie cutter approach is not going to work for autism. 

Thankfully, for many common diseases the cookie cutter approach works just fine.

Do the authors of today’s paper, Dr McDougle and Dr Thom, actually prescribe to their young patients many of the drugs that they have written about?  I doubt it and therein lies the problem.  

Time for that wizard, perhaps? 

A few years ago I did add the following tag line, under the big Epiphany at the top of the page. 

An Alternative Reality for Classic Autism - Based on Today's Science

You can choose a different Autism reality, if you do not like your current one.  I am glad I did. I didn't even need a wizard.  

There are many immuno-modulatory therapies for autism that the Massachusetts doctor duo did not mention, but it is good that they made a start.