This blog is
getting rather more detailed than I had anticipated.
Today’s post is about something very complex,
but not fully understood by anyone, so I will be somewhat superficial in my
coverage. Just click on the links to
learn more detail.
There are
two words that may be new to you – Morphology and Dendritic Spines.
Morphology, in
biology, the study of the size, shape, and structure of animals, plants, and
microorganisms and of the relationships of the parts comprising them.
For today it is really could be thought of as the
variability in size and shape of something.
A dendritic spine is a small protrusion from a
neuron's dendrite that typically receives input from a single synapse.
Dendritic spines serve as a storage site for synaptic strength and help
transmit electrical signals to the neuron's cell body. Most spines have a
bulbous head (the spine head), and a thin neck that connects the head of the
spine to the shaft of the dendrite. The dendrites of a single neuron can
contain hundreds to thousands of spines. In addition to spines providing an
anatomical substrate for memory storage and synaptic transmission, they may
also serve to increase the number of possible contacts between neurons.
Now we
combine our two new words and have a better summary of what this post is about:
Morphology of dendritic
spines and mental disease
It turns out
that shape of dendritic spines may play a key role in mental disease, including
autism.
The shape is
not fixed and live imaging studies have revealed that spines are
remarkably dynamic, changing size and shape over timescales of seconds to
minutes and of hours to days.
The shape is
important as it impacts on function, malformations lead to dysfunctions that
can affect a myriad of brain functions.
Here are
some variations in the shape of dendritic spines.
In case you
are thinking this is all rather abstract, let’s jump forward to a patent for a possible
new treatment for autism.
SUMMARY OF THE
INVENTION
Described herein are p21 -activated kinase
(PA ) inhibitors that alleviate, ameliorate, delay onset of, inhibit
progression of, or reduce the severity of at least one of the symptoms
associated with autism.
Claims
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method for treating autism
comprising administering to an individual in need thereof a therapeutically
effective amount of a p21 -activated kinase (PAK) inhibitor.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the
PAK inhibitor modulates dendritic spine morphology or synaptic function.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the
PAK inhibitor modulates dendritic spine density.
4. The method of claim 2 or 3,
wherein the PAK inhibitor modulates dendritic spine length.
5. The method of any of claims 1-4,
wherein the PAK inhibitor modulates dendritic spine neck diameter.
6. The method of any one of claims
1-5, wherein the PAK inhibitor modulates dendritic spine head volume.
7. The method of any one of claims
1-6, wherein the PAK inhibitor modulates dendritic spine head diameter.
8. The method of claim 1 or 2,
wherein the PAK inhibitor modulates the ratio of the number of mature dendritic
spines to the number of immature dendritic spines.
9. The method of claim 1 or 2,
wherein the PAK inhibitor modulates the ratio of the dendritic spine head
diameter to dendritic spine length.
10. The method of claim 1 or 2,
wherein the PAK inhibitor modulates synaptic function.
Etc …
Of course,
plenty of patents turn out to be worthless nonsense, but I think the people at Afraxis do
know what they are doing; time will tell.
Morphology or Number of Dendritic
Spines?
The PAK1
researchers and others believe the morphology (shape) of the dendritic spines
is the problem, others believe the problem is that there are just too many of
them.
Research has
shown that a particular gene (NrCAM) can increase/decrease the number of
dendritic spines.
Studies at University of North Carolina showed that
knocking out the NrCAM gene caused mice to exhibit the same sorts of social
behaviors associated with autism in humans.
Researchers from Columbia University found an
overabundance of the protein MTOR in mice bred to develop a rare form of
autism. By using a drug to limit MTOR in mice, the Columbia researchers were
able to decrease the number of dendritic spines and thus prune the
overabundance of synaptic connections during adolescence. As a result, the
social behaviors associated with autism were decreased. However, the drug (Rapamycin)
used to limit MTOR can cause serious side effects.
Dr. Tang measured synapse density in a small
section of tissue in each brain by counting the number of tiny spines that
branch from these cortical neurons; each spine connects with another neuron via
a synapse.
By late childhood, she found, spine density
had dropped by about half in the control brains, but by only 16 percent in the
brains from autism patients.
“It’s the first time that anyone has looked
for, and seen, a lack of pruning during development of children with autism,”
Dr. Sulzer said, “although lower numbers of synapses in some brain areas have
been detected in brains from older patients and in mice with autistic-like
behaviors.”
Using mouse models of autism, the researchers traced the pruning defect
to a protein called mTOR. When mTOR is overactive, they found, brain cells lose
much of their “self-eating” ability. And without this ability, the brains of
the mice were pruned poorly and contained excess synapses. “While people
usually think of learning as requiring formation of new synapses, “Dr. Sulzer
says, “the removal of inappropriate synapses may be just as important.”
“What’s remarkable about the findings,” said Dr. Sulzer, “is that
hundreds of genes have been linked to autism, but almost all of our human
subjects had overactive mTOR and decreased autophagy, and all appear to have a
lack of normal synaptic pruning. This says that many, perhaps the majority, of
genes may converge onto this mTOR/autophagy pathway, the same way that many
tributaries all lead into the Mississippi River. Overactive mTOR and reduced
autophagy, by blocking normal synaptic pruning that may underlie learning
appropriate behavior, may be a unifying feature of autism.”
Maness, a member of the UNC Neuroscience Center and the
Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, also said that there are
likely many other proteins downstream of NrCAM that depend on the protein to
maintain the proper amount of dendritic spines. Decreasing NrCAM could allow
for an increase in the levels of some of these proteins, thus kick starting the
creation of dendritic spines.
Knocking out the gene NrCAM increases the number of
dendritic spines
Gene linked to increased dendritic spines -- asignpost of autism
The view from Japan
RIKEN is a
large research institute in Japan, with an annual budget of US$760
million. Their Brain Science Institute (BSI) has a
mission to produce innovative research and technology leading to scientific
discoveries of the brain. So RIKEN BSI is like MIT just for the brain.
Science does tend to stratify by geography. Just as we saw that NGF (Nerve Growth Factor)
is the preserve of the Italians, when it comes to PAK it is the Japanese.
As you can see below the Japanese are firmly behind PAK1.
Abstract
The
serine/threonine kinase p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) modulates actin and
microtubule dynamics. The neuronal functions of Pak1, despite its abundant
expression in the brain, have not yet been fully delineated. Previously, we
reported that Pak1 mediates initiation of dendrite formation. In the present
study, the role of Pak1 in dendritogenesis, spine formation and maintenance was
examined in detail. Overexpression of constitutively active-Pak1 in immature
cortical neurons increased not only the number of the primary branching on
apical dendrites but also the number of basal dendrites. In contrast,
introduction of dominant negative-Pak caused a reduction in both of these
morphological features. The length and the number of secondary apical branch
points of dendrites were not significantly different in cultured neurons
expressing these mutant forms, suggesting that Pak1 plays a role in
dendritogenesis. Pak1 also plays a role in the formation and maintenance of
spines, as evidenced by the altered spine morphology, resulting from
overexpression of mutant forms of Pak1 in immature and mature hippocampal
neurons. Thus, our results provide further evidence of the key role of Pak1 in
the regulation of dendritogenesis, dendritic arborization, the spine formation,
and maintenance.
SHANK3 and Dendritic Spines
Mutations of
the SHANK3 gene are known to cause autism.
Researchers
in France found that SHANK3 mutations lead to
modification of dendritic spine morphology and they identified the mechanism.
You may
recall in my earlier posts on growth factors that it was this type of autism
that responded to treatment with IGF1.
If you take
a broader look at today’s subject you will see that various growth factors are
indeed closely involved. Here is some
comment from Wayman Lab at Washington
State University:-
"Not surprisingly, abnormalities
in dendritic arborization and spinogenesis, which diminish neuronal
connectivity, are a common feature of the cognitively compromised aging brain
as well as numerous forms of mental retardation including Fragile X, Fetal
alcohol, Downs and Retts syndromes.
It is clear that changes in
synaptic activity and neurotropic factors (e.g., BDNF) are effective initiators
of the remodeling process and result in long-term alterations in dendrite and
spine structure. What is not known are the molecular mechanisms that underlie
how they stimulate dendritic spine formation."
Take your pick
So it looks
like three different methods may exist to potentially modify dendritic spine
numbers and morphology:-
1. PAK1
Much work is
ongoing regarding PAK1. It is my current
favorite.
For those
interested here is a recent study using FRAX486 on Fragile X mice.
Abnormal dendritic spines are a common feature in FXS,
idiopathic autism, and intellectual disability. Thus, this neuroanatomical
abnormality may contribute to disease symptoms and severity. Here we take a
hypothesis-driven, mechanism-based approach to the search for an effective
therapy for FXS. We hypothesize that a treatment that rescues the dendritic
spine defect may also ameliorate behavioral symptoms. Thus, we targeted a
protein that regulates spines through modulation of actin cytoskeleton
dynamics: p21-activated kinase (PAK). In a healthy brain, PAK and FMRP - the
protein product of fmr1 - antagonize one another to regulate spine number and
shape. Inhibition of PAK with a strategy utilizing mouse genetics reverses
spine abnormalities as well as cognitive and behavioral symptoms in fmr1 KO
mice, as we demonstrated in our previous publication. This discovery highlights
PAK as a potential target for drug discovery research. In this thesis work, we
build on this finding to test whether the small molecule FRAX486 - selected for
its ability to inhibit PAK - can rescue behavioral, morphological, and
physiological phenotypes in fmr1 KO mice. Our results demonstrate that seizures and behavioral
abnormalities such as hyperactivity, repetitive movements, and habituation to a
novel environment can all be rescued by FRAX486. Moreover, FRAX486
reverses spine phenotypes in adult mice, thereby supporting the hypothesis that a drug treatment
which reverses the spine abnormalities can also treat neurological and
behavioral symptoms.
2. mTOR
In spite of its noted toxicity,
Rapamycin, is about to be tested in a clinical trial on a rare type of autism
called TSC:-
When commenting on the use
of Bumetanide for autism, I recall the President of the Institute was quoted as saying:-
"So many things cure cancer
in mice and rats, and so many things cure all kinds of things and then when we
give them to humans they have adverse effects and don't fix the problems we
thought they could fix," says Gary Goldstein, president and CEO of the
Kennedy Krieger Institute, a Baltimore-based clinic and research center.
"I wouldn't give it to my child, I can tell you that."
I found it a little odd that
he gave the green light to trialing Rapamycin in children, given the long list
of very nasty side effects.
3. NrCAM
Manesslab at UNC is clearly the centre for research into
finding therapeutic agents surrounding NrCAM.
It looks like this is still some way from trials in humans.
“Too
many spines and too many excitatory connections that are not pruned between
early childhood and adolescence could be one of the chief problems underlying
autism. Our goal is to understand the molecular mechanisms involved in pruning
and find promising targets for therapeutic agents.”
Conclusion
It should
not be surprising that multiple pathways may have the same therapeutic benefit on dendritic spines. We only need one to be safe and effective.
The link
back to human growth factors is interesting since we know these are disturbed
in autism and other mental conditions, but the dysfunction varies by sub-type. In fact, Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) would
likely be an effective therapy for dementia and perhaps even Retts syndrome.
In the next post we will learn some more interesting things about growth factor anomalies in autism. It turns out that something
called Akt, also known as protein kinase B (PKB), may be behind them all. A related protein called protein kinase C (PKC), is known to affect the morphology of dendritic spines. There is also protein kinase A (PKA). Both PKA and PKB have been shown to have reduced activity in regressive autism, this will also be covered later.