UA-45667900-1

Tuesday, 23 February 2016

Therapeutic Epigenetics in Autism and Junk DNA




Today’s post takes another dip into the genetics of autism and currently existing therapies that could be re-purposed for autism.  We also see that many secrets remain beyond the 3% of your DNA that usually gets all the research attention.  The remaining 97% is not junk after all.

There was an earlier post on this blog that introduced Epigenetics.  It is not such a complicated subject, just think about it as little tags on your DNA that turn genes on/off usually when they should not be, but there remains the possibility to use epigenetics for good.  In people with under-expression of an important gene you could “tag it” and then increase its expression.

The exome is the part of your DNA that encodes the various proteins needed to build your body.  The remaining 97% of your DNA was once thought to be just junk; we saw in recent post that one part contains enhancers and silencers that control expression of the genes in the 3% that is the exome.

A recent study of gene expression in neurological conditions including autism showed just how broadly disturbed gene expression is.







(A) Consistent fold enrichments were found for each cell type across fourteen cortical and three subcortical brain regions of Alzheimer's patients. The box plots mark the distribution of cellular fold enrichments across all the brain regions examined. Asterisks mark that the fold enrichment for each cell type that was found to be significantly non-zero with p < 0.05. (B) Two independent autism studies show the same cellular phenotypes, including upregulation of glial cells and downregulation of neurons. Asterisks mark those cell types found to be significantly differential with p < 0.05 after BH correction over all groups.


Here I am making the point that even though only a handful of genes may have an identifiable dysfunction, a much broader range of genes seem to be affected, as we see in the wide range of over and under expressed genes.

While it would be logical to think about a specific dysfunction needing a therapy that targets just that gene, this appears not to be necessary.

It appears that downstream processes may be the most damaging/relevant, for example disturbances in Protein Kinase A and C (PKA and PKC) may play a key role in many cases of regressive autism, and this will feature in its own post, because it would be treatable today. 

Reduced activity of protein kinase C in the frontal cortex of subjects with regressive autism: relationship with developmental abnormalities.


Brain Region–Specific Decrease in the Activity and Expression of Protein Kinase A inthe Frontal Cortex of Regressive Autism

 

Both the above papers are by Abha and Ved Chauhan.  I put Abha on my Dean’s list long ago.  I did have a discussion with her a while back.  She is clearly a very nice person and intellectually towers over the Curemark lady (Joan Fallon) who gets $40 million to play with her pancreatic enzymes, but never publishes anything except very superficial patents.


I think for $40 million Abha and Ved could figure it all out.

PKB, otherwise known as Akt is also very relevant to some types of autism.

Tamoxifen, recently shown to reverse autism in a SHANK3 mouse model, is a PKC inhibitor.

Another epigenetic drug, Theophylline activates PKA.

Akt, also known as protein kinase B (PKB), is a central node in cell signaling downstream of growth factors, cytokines, and other cellular stimuli. Aberrant loss or gain of Akt activation underlies the pathophysiological properties of a variety of complex diseases, including type-2 diabetes and cancer.

If you could identify if a particular person was hypo/hyper in PKA, PKB and PKC, this might well open the door to an effective treatment.


Research on PKB, also known as AKT

Dysregulation of theIGF-I/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in autism spectrum disorders.




And a paper from the clever Japanese:-



Autism spectrum disorder is a set of neurodevelopmental disorders in terms of prevalence, morbidity and impact to the society, which is characterized by intricate behavioral phenotype and deficits in both social and cognitive functions. The molecular pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder has not been well understood, however, it seems that PI3K, AKT, and its downstream molecules have crucial roles in the molecular pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder. The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway plays an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, motility, and protein synthesis. Deregulated PI3K/AKT signaling has also been shown to be associated with the autism spectrum disorder. Discovery of molecular biochemical phenotypes would represent a breakthrough in autism research. This study has provided new insight on the mechanism of the disorder and would open up future opportunity for contributions to understand the pathophysiology


For those who favour dietary intervention:-




  
Based on the above chart curcumin should likely be good for my N=1 case of autism. Time will tell.



Consequences of upstream dysfunctions

So it might be better to consider autism as a disease of wider downstream gene expression, rather than necessarily of “faulty” genes.  Modulating the resulting wider gene expression may be much more realistic than fixing individual genes.

It is certainly plausible that the body has its own protective self-repair mechanism that might be somehow re-energized. Some people have pondered why so many highly intelligent mathematicians and computer scientists seem have relatives with autism.  The clever genes do associate with a type of autism plus ID/MR.  It was suggested that protective genetic changes might be in play, so that the people with the most genetic variance are actually the family members without the autism.

This does remain conjecture, but as more whole genome data is collected we are seeing some interesting findings.

A fascinating very recent study that looked at a group of 53 families with autism using the traditional approach of whole exome sequencing and also microarray. 

Using these methods, that are the current gold standard, the researchers found very little.  Dysfunctions in the 700 known autism genes were not detected.

However using more expensive whole genome sequencing, dysfunctions were identified in the “DNA junk” zone very close beside the known autism genes.  The researchers were then able to identify the genetic cause of 30% of the cases, a big improvement on 0%.  I expect if they looked a little harder the 30% would be higher.


“We performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 208 genomes from 53 families affected by simplex autism.”

“For the majority of these families, no copy-number variant (CNV) or candidate de novo gene-disruptive single-nucleotide variant (SNV) had been detected by microarray or whole-exome sequencing (WES).

Comparing the sequences of the individuals with autism and those of their unaffected siblings, the researchers found that people with autism are more likely to have genetic variants — either single base-pair changes in the sequence or small CNVs — in swaths of DNA abutting known autism genes. But the researchers only found the variants after they restricted their search to regions of the genome already implicated in autism, and even then the statistical significance is modest.

Sequencing whole genomes could reveal the genetic cause of autism in as much as 30 percent of people for whom faster and cheaper sequencing methods come up short

“It’s increasing power even in areas that are supposed to be covered by whole-exome sequencing,” says Peixoto. “It seems that it’s clear that whole-genome sequencing will become the standard.”







One specific microRNA has strong links to autism spectrum disorder, say TSRI scientists


Epigenopathies

Many diseases have an epigenetic component. The severe progressive asthma that is COPD is a well-known example.  It appears that smoking in middle age often leads to permanent epigenetic changes that come back to haunt often then non-smokers in old age.  Even though they have not smoked for twenty years, there oxidative stress response has been permanently modified.  This results in a kind of steroid resistance, so that usually reliable drug therapies fail to work. 

It is thought that autism has an epigenetic component.  This would do some way to explaining 30-40% of the increase in prevalence in recent years that is not explained by ever widening diagnostic criteria.

Because epigenetic changes can be heritable and can be accumulated from all kinds of exposures, even simple ones like severe emotional stress and pollution, you can reconcile autism as being primarily a genetic condition even though incidence has clearly risen within one or two generations. So you can have an “epigenetic epidemic”, so to speak.


Epigenetics as a therapy

While much is written about epigenetic change being bad, it could also be good.

There are many known substances that affect gene expression; some are very target specific which is useful.

This answers a recent issue raised by a reader of this blog who did exome sequencing. What is the point of discovering a genetic dysfunction if there is no therapy? Medicine is some decades behind science, better to know what gene is affected because you well be able to affect its expression, you just need some help from Google.

Epigenetic therapy could be used to remove unwanted tags, but it could also be used to leave new ones to upregulate under-expressed genes.

Such epigenetic therapy is already a reality in COPD and is being considered for rare single autisms where one copy of the gene is not functional, so turn up the volume on the remaining copy.

As we saw in the post on epigenetics, one potential category of drugs are HDAC inhibitors, these would affect one epigenetic mechanism.

There are many such HDAC inhibitors and most have other modes of action, so you cannot be sure what is giving the noted effect.


Valproate

This epilepsy drug has numerous effects including as a HDAC inhibitor.  Given to mothers during pregnancy it can cause autism in the offspring, but when given to the affected offspring the autism can be reduced.

Valproate is given off label to treat autism even when no epilepsy is present.

As we saw in the comments section, long term valproate se can have side effects.


Sulforaphane

This substance derived from broccoli and patented by Johns Hopkins, is another HDAC inhibitor.  It also upregulates Nrf2, which turns on the oxidative response genes.  This was proposed as a COPD therapy by Professor Barnes.

We saw in a post that for Nrf2 to have its full effect there needed to be enough of a protein called DJ-1.  You can increase DJ-1 expression with cinnamon (sodium benzoate).

That was one reason to think that cinnamon would complement Sulforaphane as a therapy for both COPD and some autism.


Sodium Butyrate

Sodium Butyrate is an HDAC inhibitor that is available as a supplement. We came across it in an earlier post as a precursor to butyric acid.  Butyric acid plays a role in the permeability of the gut and the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB).  It also seems to protect from auto immune disease.

Butyrate is fed to millions of farm animals every day to increase their resistance to auto-immune disease.

Butyric acid is produced naturally in the gut by the bacteria living there, however the amount can be increased by the uses of a particular probiotic-bacteria.

This would support the uses of sodium butyrate and the Miyari 588 bacteria.

I have on my to-do-list to investigate higher doses of Miyari 588, but having read the comment by Alli that 500 mg of sodium butyrate is effective, I will try that first.  She also found higher doses ineffective, which was the same in a mouse study published last November,

The study below highlights which genes were down-regulated and which were up-regulated, the overall effect was beneficial


Sodium butyrate attenuate ssocial behavior deficits and modifies the transcription ofinhibitory/excitatory genes in the frontal cortex of an autism model.

 

The core behavioral symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) include dysregulation of social communication and the presence of repetitive behaviors. However, there is no pharmacological agent that is currently used to target these core symptoms. Epigenetic dysregulation has been implicated in the etiology of ASD, and may present a pharmacological target. The effect of sodium butyrate, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, on social behavior and repetitive behavior, and the frontal cortex transcriptome, was examined in the BTBR autism mouse model. A 100 mg/kg dose, but not a 1200 mg/kg dose, of sodium butyrate attenuated social deficits in the BTBR mouse model. In addition, both doses decreased marble burying, an indication of repetitive behavior, but had no significant effect on self-grooming. Using RNA-seq, we determined that the 100 mg/kg dose of sodium butyrate induced changes in many behavior-related genes in the prefrontal cortex, and particularly affected genes involved in neuronal excitation or inhibition. The decrease in several excitatory neurotransmitter and neuronal activation marker genes, including cFos Grin2b, and Adra1, together with the increase in inhibitory neurotransmitter genes Drd2 and Gabrg1, suggests that sodium butyrate promotes the transcription of inhibitory pathway transcripts. Finally, DMCM, a GABA reverse agonist, decreased social behaviors in sodium butyrate treated BTBR mice, suggesting that sodium butyrate increases social behaviors through modulation of the excitatory/inhibitory balance. Therefore, transcriptional modulation by sodium butyrate may have beneficial effects on autism related behaviors.


  

Theophylline

Theophylline is an old asthma drug that is an HDAC inhibitor.

At low doses it is now being trialled as an epigenetic add-on therapy in COPD.  It pretty obviously does work, but data needs to be collected to measure how effective it is and what is the best dose.

It shows how the COPD researchers/clinicians like Professor Barnes are doing a good job and not frightened to experiment.

Would a similar low dose of theophylline benefit a sub-group of those with autism/schizophrenia?  I think it is quite likely.

COPD and autism/schizophrenia share the same impaired oxidative stress response.



Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a progressive lung disease characterised by progressive airflow limitation. In the UK, it affects around 3 million people, is the fifth leading cause of death and costs the NHS approximately £1 billion annually. Exacerbations of COPD account for 60% of NHS COPD costs and are associated with accelerated rate of lung function decline, reduced physical activity, reduced quality of life, increased mortality and increased risk of co-morbidities. COPD treatment guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to reduce exacerbations and improve lung function. However, in COPD, airway inflammation is relatively insensitive to the anti-inflammatory effects of ICS and even high doses fail to prevent exacerbations. Preclinical and pilot studies demonstrate that low dose theophylline may increase the sensitivity of the airway inflammation to ICS, and thus when used with ICS will reduce the rate of COPD exacerbation. In this study we will determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding low dose theophylline to ICS therapy in patients with COPD. The primary outcome is the number of exacerbations. The primary economic outcome is the cost-per-QALY gained during the one year treatment period. We will recruit 1424 participants from primary and secondary care across seven areas of the UK. Participants will be randomised to theophylline (200 mg once or twice daily depending on smoking status and weight) or placebo for 12 months. We will follow participants up at six and twelve months to assess the number of exacerbations. We will also collect data on adverse events, health care utilisation, quality of life and breathlessness, and lung function. Low dose theophylline is cheap (10p/day) and, if shown to make current ICS therapy more effective in a cost effective manner, it will improve the quality of life of COPD patients and reduce the burden of COPD on the NHS.


At large doses, Theophylline has long been a therapy for asthma and COPD, but as with Sodium Butyrate, it is quite possible that larger doses of Theophylline produce a different result.  In other words the epigenetic effect fortunately comes from the low dose.

Low doses mean less chance of side effects.

For example, in anyone predisposed to reflux/GERD/GORD many asthma drugs pose a problem because at the same time as opening the airways in your lungs they will relax the lower esophageal sphincter and allow stomach acid to rise upwards.

We saw in an earlier post that in some types of autism something called mGluR5 is dysfunctional in the brain. By chance mGluR5 is also involved in closing the lower esophageal sphincter.  In people with reflux/GERD/GORD a mGluR5 inhibitor was found to have promise for the management of their symptoms.


Randomised clinical trial:effects of monotherapy with ADX10059, a mGluR5 inhibitor, on symptoms and reflux events in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.




So it is not surprising that many people with autism also have reflux/GERD/GORD. 

But the dysfunction with mGluR5 in autism can be both hyper and hypo, so the therapy might be a positive allosteric modulator (PAM), or a negative allosteric modulator (NAM).  

In someone with autism + reflux/GERD/GORD  it would be reasonable to think a NAM, like ADX10059, might help both conditions.



Gene Repression and Genome Stability

There is another epigenetic process that may be disturbing gene expression in some people and may be treatable.

I have been trying to find why so many people with autism can benefit from biotin; I think I have found a plausible explanation.

“Biotinylation of histones plays a role in gene repression and repression of transposable elements, thereby maintaining genome stability”

I think in some people with autism and no clinical deficiency of biotin the continued “overdosing” of biotin might be having an effect on gene expression, bringing things a little closer to where they should be.

Rather beyond the scope of this blog, it appears that in some people the impaired genome stability, reversible with biotin(ylation), this might be a significant cancer risk.

In essence, for most people supraphysiological concentrations of biotin will do absolutely nothing, but in a sub-group it might do a lot of good.  It is epigenetic, but you do not have to understand it to benefit from it.  It is complicated.




Transposable elements such as long terminal repeats (LTR) constitute 45% of the human genome; transposition events impair genome stability. Fifty-four promoter-active retrotransposons have been identified in humans. Epigenetic mechanisms are important for transcriptional repression of retrotransposons, preventing transposition events, and abnormal regulation of genes. Here, we demonstrate that the covalent binding of the vitamin biotin to lysine-12 in histone H4 (H4K12bio) and lysine-9 in histone H2A (H2AK9bio), mediated by holocarboxylase synthetase (HCS), is an epigenetic mechanism to repress retrotransposon transcription in human and mouse cell lines and in primary cells from a human supplementation study. Abundance of H4K12bio and H2AK9bio at intact retrotransposons and a solitary LTR depended on biotin supply and HCS activity and was inversely linked with the abundance of LTR transcripts. Knockdown of HCS in Drosophila melanogaster enhances retrotransposition in the germline. Importantly, we demonstrated that depletion of H4K12bio and H2AK9bio in biotin-deficient cells correlates with increased production of viral particles and transposition events and ultimately decreases chromosomal stability. Collectively, this study reveals a novel diet-dependent epigenetic mechanism that could affect cancer risk.

Here, we provide evidence for the existence of a novel diet-dependent epigenetic mechanism that represses retrotransposons. Importantly, we demonstrated that depletion of biotinylated histones in biotin-deficient cells increases LTR transcript levels, production of viral particles, and retrotransposition events, and ultimately decreases chromosomal stability. Both biotin deficiency and supplementation are prevalent in the US. For example, moderate biotin deficiency has been observed in up to 50% of pregnant women (35,36). About 20% of the US population reports taking biotin supplements (37), producing supraphysiological concentrations of vitamin in tissues and body fluids (23,28,35). The findings presented here suggest that altered biotin status in these population subgroups might affect chromosomal stability and cancer risk. 

Biotin and biotinidase deficiency


Biotin requirements for DNA damage prevention



  

Conclusion

I never got round to writing part 2 of my epigenetics post, but my experience of HDAC inhibitors to date has been very positive.

I would be the first to admit that this is rather hit and miss.  It was only when reading the paper on potential therapies for Pitt Hopkins, that was openly musing about HDAC inhibitors, in an equally hit and miss approach, that I thought I would write further about it.

It really seems totally haphazard, because you cannot predict the effect with any level of certainty.  If there is a self-repair mechanism trying to maintain homeostasis of the genome, haphazard may be good enough.

10mg of biotin twice a day does have a mild but noticeable stabilizing effect; is this caused by better maintaining genome stability? I have no idea. 

I will try sodium butyrate and if it works I will have to establish what dose of Miyari 588 produces the same effect.  Both are used in animal feed to reduce inflammatory disease, so you are already indirectly exposed to them if you eat meat.

Theophylline should also be investigated.  This is a very well understood drug and small doses really do seem to help people with COPD.

PKA, PKB and PKC are likely at the core of most people’s autism.  Many existing therapies can modify their expression.

Whole genome sequencing, carried out at great precision, is clearly the only satisfactory genetic testing method.  The other, cheaper, methods are just missing key data and giving many false negative results, i.e. saying there are no identifiable genetic dysfunctions, when this is not true.







Wednesday, 10 February 2016

More Failed Autism Trials and (28 million) thoughts as to why



Two autism therapies mentioned in this blog have recently failed in their clinical trials.

The selective mGluR5 antagonist mavoglurant failed in two trials funded by Roche and Coronado Biosciences threw in the towel with its Trichuris suis ova (“TSO”) program.  TSO are parasites that are introduced to the gut to modify the immune response, they are thought to help conditions like ulcerative colitis and some autism.



"Coronado Biosciences (NASDAQ: CNDO) has decided to no longer pursue the development of its Trichuris suis ova (“TSO”) program. The Company is terminating all on-going TSO trials, including the Company’s Phase 2A clinical trial of TSO in pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorder. A preliminary analysis of data from this trial failed to demonstrate any signal of activity."


The original user of TSO in autism documented his case here:-

http://autismtso.com/

It has been a long time since the father updated his site. Does he still give TSO to his son?

This adds to a growing list of very expensive failures.

The good news is that people are beginning to wonder why these, and all the previous trials, "failed".  Perhaps some were not failures, rather narrowly selective successes.  A new initiative is underway called Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials to try to develop more objective measures both for diagnosing autism in young children and for tracking changes.


"The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials (ABC-CT) is a multicenter research study based at Yale that spans Duke University, Boston Children’s Hospital, the University of Washington/Seattle Children’s Research Institute and the University of California, Los Angeles. The aim of the consortium is to develop reliable and objective measurements of social function and communication in people with autism."
  

NIH provides $28M to study autism biomarkers via its Biomarkers Consortium


That is a lot of money.



I wish them well.

I do not think they fully realize the task facing them.  There are hundreds of “autisms” and many are dynamic, so changing over time.  Even if you find a responder to a therapy, if you tested the same person six months later he might not respond positively. 

It is highly unlikely that any single therapy can target all the symptoms in any case of autism.  So multiple therapies will be needed.

For many people, autism is a moving target, any kind of allergy, tooth issue or other inflammation could cause a false negative.



Single Gene vs Idiopathic Autism

It should be much easier to develop treatment for single gene autisms, like Fragile X, than for the idiopathic (“we have no clue what causes it”) autisms.  The above trials by Roche were in Fragile-X, where at least you know that all the subjects in the trial started with the same single gene dysfunction. 

But do they have other genetic/epigenetic dysfunctions?  Do they all have the same downstream dysfunctions? 

Fragile X is caused by a lack of the FRMP protein, perhaps the only time to correct this is very early in life.  Thereafter you have the downstream consequences, some of which overlap with ideopathic autism, some of these may well be treatable. 


 Autism Case Reports and Anecdotal Evidence

A good source of information remains published case reports.  These are documented pieces of anecdotal evidence showing what appeared to help a particular person. Here is one highlighted recently by Agnieszka, a reader of this blog.

Beta-Lactam Antibiotics as A Possible Novel Therapy for Managing Epilepsy and Autism, A Case Report and Review of Literature



The index patient is a 9 year old boy with autism spectrum disorder diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). He suffered from generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy from age 4. He had taken multiple different medications such as phenobarbital, sodium valporate, and carbamazepine with sufficient dosages and durations without favorable control of his epilepsy. According to his parents’ reports, the patient took cefixime 200mg/day to control diarrhea about 2 years ago. The seizure episodes were dramatically decreased 3 days after starting the medication while the there was no change in his anti-epileptic medication regime. The seizure episodes were controlled for about 5 months, after which the number of seizure episodes again increased. His highly educated parents administered cefixime 200mg/day to control seizure again. They reported that seizure attacks were controlled markedly after taking cefixime for three days. The patient was not febrile while the medication trials were administered. Both parents reported that they repeated this trial for several times to control the seizure episodes in the recent years. The epilepsy was controlled in all of the trials after taking cefixime for 3 to 5 days. Then, they discontinued cefixime after 7 days. They reported that there was a marked decreased in the number of seizure attacks as well as aggressive behaviors.


You cannot read too much into any one case report, other than to note how many totally unrelated interventions seem to benefit unique cases of autism.  This only goes to show that totally unrelated dysfunctions can manifest themselves as “autism”.

If you grouped all the anecdotal evidence together you would have some interesting reading.  If someone actually followed up on these anecdotes and did some additional investigation on each case we might learn very much more.



Previous Autism Clinical Trials

When I read the original clinical trials of NAC and Bumetanide in Autism, the results seemed good enough to me to warrant my own trial.

I do not see why there has not yet been a follow up of Stanford’s trial of NAC.  There was a patent (below) and then nothing.  It clearly works in many people, but most clinicians will not prescribe it until it is “evidence based”.  Those granted the patent should then go and collect some more evidence.



Bumetanide has also been patented for autism and the next stage of trials will follow, we are informed.

I will be interested to see whether the phase 3 trials are solid enough to convince mainstream clinicians to actually prescribe it.  "A diuretic for autism, come on, be serious!"

Nothing would surprise me.


Funding for Future Trials

It would be a bold person who invested any profit-seeking capital in autism trials, but they keep coming forward.  Here is another new one, OV101 from start-up Ovid.

The only reliable source is public money and philanthropy.

It looks like the US NIH (National Institutes of Health) still has deep pockets and Jim Simons keeps backing his Foundation.



mGLuR5

Roche may not have succeeded with their mGLuR5 drug, mavoglurant, but mGluR5 remains a target for treating schizophrenia and autism



Receptors in brain linked to schizophrenia, autism



Disruption of mGluR5 in parvalbumin-positive interneurons induces corefeatures of neurodevelopmental disorders





What would a successful Autism Trial look like?

Given the heterogeneous nature of autism, even a really effective drug might not look so good in the data.  Very specific drugs that counter the disorders where there can be both hypo and hyper, will come out with some good responders, some with no effect and a sizable number with a bad effect; so on average not so good.

Drugs that affect the most common down stream effect, oxidative stress, would come out best.  So I the results Hardan obtained in his Stanford trial of NAC will be as good as it gets.  Those results were enough for me, but not so impressive to many.

Now reconsider a long forgotten trial of an anti-depressant drug, developed from a first generation antihistamine.

This trial has a rather eclectic mix of 26 subjects, but 36% were responders, either much improved or very much improved in a wide variety of symptoms including aggression, self-injury, irritability, hyperactivity, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. However the authors judge the trial drug as: 


  "Mirtazapine was well tolerated but showed only modest effectiveness for treating the associated symptoms of autistic disorder" 


What were they hoping for ?






Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to conduct a naturalistic, open-label examination of the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine (a medication with both serotonergic and noradrenergic properties) in the treatment of associated symptoms of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs).
METHODS:

Twenty-six subjects (5 females, 21 males; ages 3.8 to 23.5 years; mean age 10.1 +/- 4.8 years) with PDDs (20 with autistic disorder, 1 with Asperger's disorder, 1 with Rett's disorder, and 4 with PDDs not otherwise specified were treated with open-label mirtazapine (dose range, 7.5-45 mg daily; mean 30.3 +/- 12.6 mg daily). Twenty had comorbid mental retardation, and 17 were taking concomitant psychotropic medications. At endpoint, subjects' primary caregivers were interviewed using the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, and a side-effect checklist.

RESULTS:

Twenty-five of 26 subjects completed at least 4 weeks of treatment (mean 150 +/- 103 days). Nine of 26 subjects (34.6%) were judged responders ("much improved" or "very much improved" on the CGI) based on improvement in a variety of symptoms including aggression, self-injury, irritability, hyperactivity, anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Mirtazapine did not improve core symptoms of social or communication impairment. Adverse effects were minimal and included increased appetite, irritability, and transient sedation.

CONCLUSIONS:


Mirtazapine was well tolerated but showed only modest effectiveness for treating the associated symptoms of autistic disorder and other PDDs.



I think that was a successful trial that should have been followed up, rather then being forgotten.








Friday, 5 February 2016

Propranolol, Autism and Sodium Ion Channels Nav1.1, Nav1.2, Nav1.3 and Nav1.5









When writing this blog I frequently wonder what happened to all the very clever people; why are these full-time paid researchers often missing the obvious?







Boy with severe headache and ASD, awaiting Propranolol


The answer is, with a few notable exceptions (Catterall, Ben-Ari etc), the clever ones do not study autism, they study things that are much better defined, rare things like Angelman Syndrome and, recently, Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome.  These researchers seem much more rigorous.  For example:-


David Sweatt (Pitt Hopkins)

Pitt–Hopkins Syndrome: intellectual disability due to loss of TCF4-regulated gene transcription



Edwin Weeber (Angelman syndrome)



So autism is left to what might be termed the Baron Cohen brigade.



Propranolol

Propranolol is a medication of the beta blocker type.  It is used to treat high blood pressure, a number of types of irregular heart rate, thyrotoxicosis, performance anxiety, and essential tremors. It is used to prevent migraine headaches, and to prevent further heart problems in those with angina or previous heart attacks.

It is a nonselective beta blocker which works by blocking β-adrenergic receptors.

While once a first-line treatment for hypertension, they do not perform as well as other drugs, particularly in the elderly, and evidence is increasing that the most frequently used beta blockers at usual doses carry an unacceptable risk of provoking type 2 diabetes.

Beta blockers block the action of endogenous catecholamines epinephrine (adrenaline) and norepinephrine(noradrenaline) on adrenergic beta receptors, of the sympathetic nervous system, which mediates the fight-or-flight response. Some block all activation of β-adrenergic receptors and others are selective.

It is occasionally used to treat performance anxiety.   Given the effect (above) on the fight or flight response this is logical.

The sympathetic nervous system's primary process is to stimulate the body's fight-or-flight response. It is, however, constantly active at a basic level to maintain homeostasis.

Evidence to support the use in other anxiety disorders is poor.

But what the ever useful Wikipedia almost glosses over is the part I find more interesting:-



  
Now we have to hope that cardiologists prescribing Propranolol are fully aware of the role of Nav1.5 in the heart and its role in heart rate.  This has nothing to do with it being a beta blocker.

Hopefully neurologists prescribing it for certain severe headaches understand the role of Nav1.1 in the brain.

It would not surprise me if they did not.



Propranolol earlier in this Blog

Earlier in this blog there are comments regarding the use of low doses of Propranolol to treat anxiety in autism.

Some people report it works wonders, while for others it did nothing.


  


Propranolol in Autism Research


A study was published recently and a reader drew my attention to it, but there have also been a few others.

Blood pressure medicine may improve conversational skills of individuals with autism


An hour after administration, the researchers had a structured conversation with the participants, scoring their performance on six social skills necessary to maintain a conversation: staying on topic, sharing information, reciprocity or shared conversation, transitions or interruptions, nonverbal communication and maintaining eye contact. The researchers found the total communication scores were significantly greater when the individual took propranolol compared to the placebo.
"Though more research is needed to study its effects after more than one dose, these preliminary results show a potential benefit of propranolol to improve the conversational and nonverbal skills of individuals with autism," said Beversdorf

  

Effect of propranolol on verbal problem solving in autism spectrum disorder


Effect of Propranolol on Functional Connectivity in Autism Spectrum Disorder—A Pilot Study




Back to Channelopathies

There are 24,000 human genes, but a much more manageable number of ion channels.  For each ion channel or transporter, there is a gene that expresses it.

When ion channels malfunction, it is called a channelopathy.  Channelopathies are quite well researched and very common in autism.  Early on in this blog I simplified idiopathic classic autism with the following chart.

I suspect that people with channelopathies (Nav1.1, Nav1,2, Nav1.3) caused by dysfunctions in the genes SCN1A, SCN2A, SCN3A are the ones that will most benefit from Propranolol.

I suspect those people will already suffer terrible headaches and/or seizures.

These three channelopathies have been known to be associated with autism for ten years.









Nav1.1 / SCN1A


Migraine, other headaches
Epilepsy


Regular readers will know that Professor Catterall is the expert on sodium channels and here he is again below




Nav1.2 / SCN2A

http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/SCN2A

Epileptic encephalopathy, early infantile, 11 (EIEE11): An autosomal dominant seizure disorder characterized by neonatal or infantile onset of refractory seizures with resultant delayed neurologic development and persistent neurologic abnormalities. Patients may progress to West syndrome, which is characterized by tonic spasms with clustering, arrest of psychomotor development, and hypsarrhythmia on EEG


Nav1.3 / SCN3A


neuronal hyperexcitability and epilepsy 

         Novel SCN3A variants associated with focal epilepsy in             children.





Nav1.5 / SCN5A

http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/SCN5A

Mainly heart conditions, since this ion channel is expressed mainly in the heart.




Autism and Nav1.1, Nav1.2, Nav1.3

For many years it has been known that the hundreds of variations in the genes SCN1A, SCN2A and SCN3A are associated with autism.  So we can consider them pretty well established autism genes.

Clearly any drug affecting expression of those genes, or affecting the ion channels they express, should be a target autism drug.






Conclusion

Some people with autism and severe headaches, or epilepsy, have an underlying sodium channelopathy.  Sodium channel blockers are not as well understood/ developed as calcium channel blockers.

In some cases, but maybe not all, this should be detectable by genetic testing of the genes SCN1A, SCN2A and SCN3A.

If you live in a country that does not bother with genetic testing, you might want to fall back on trial and error and discuss Propranolol with your doctor.

Did all the people with Asperger’s, in the recent study, who became more conversational after a single dose of Propranolol, have problems with Nav1.1, Nav1.2 or Nav1.3 ?  I doubt it.  The other commonly known effects of Propranolol should also play a role.

But for a sub-set of people with Strictly Defined Autism, Propranolol might be hugely beneficial.  Perhaps Professor Catterall should investigate?









Tuesday, 2 February 2016

Central histamine (dys)function, antidepressants, appetite, autism and behavior

One day last week Monty, aged 12 with ASD, was watching an old Tom and Jerry DVD.  These DVDs, along with the other action-packed ones, once got hidden away because they drove Monty wild; now they do not.

This is what I was doing while Tom was chasing                                                                         Jerry.

I received another interesting comment from a reader who found a small dose of an antidepressant had a very positive effect on his 9 year old daughter:-


“My daughter (9, ASD) recently started on a very small dose of Remeron, in an effort to increase weight and as a bonus, hopefully improve sleep. It has done both. It also had an immediate unexpected but delightful side effect of improved social skills, more fluent speech and increased amount of conversation. The first day she tried it she made friends with random children in the park, and they had a discussion about how they would design their dream playground. (DD said she would invent and upside down slide, where you start at the bottom and slide up.) It has been amazing for her (so far.)  ”


In most families it is the parents who take the antidepressants.

I recalled that one class of antidepressant was actually developed from an old antihistamine drug, tricyclic antidepressants.

Remeron, otherwise known as Mirtazapine, is indeed a tricyclic antidepressant.


Not only is Remeron, in effect, a first generation antihistamine, i.e. one that was not designed to stay outside the blood brain barrier, but it is a rather potent one.

Within the brain Remeron/Mirtazapine:-

HR occupancy (HRO) of mirtazapine reached 80-90 % in the cerebral neocortex


Histamine H receptor occupancy by the new-generation antidepressants fluvoxamine and mirtazapine: a positron emission tomography study in healthy volunteers.

This means that 80-90% of the type 1 histamine receptors in that part of the brain are blocked from action.



Histamine Receptors and the Blood Brain Barrier

There were several earlier posts in this blog regarding histamine.

There are four known types of histamine receptors H1, H2, H3 and H4.

In one way or the other, all four are likely relevant to autism.  Drugs are not yet available for H4.  H3 therapies are likely to improve cognitive function in some. H4 appears to play a role in the overexpression of mast cells in allergic tissues.  So those with severe mast cell issues should watch the H4 drug pipeline.

Histamine H4 Receptor Mediates Chemotaxis and Calcium Mobilization of Mast Cells



An important point to remember is that while histamine does not cross the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB), H1 antihistamines do cross, including the ones designed not to cross.

All antihistamines cross blood-brain barrier



Within the brain, histamine functions as a neurotransmitter, but it is not the same histamine as that released by mast cells in your nose, when you have hay fever.  Histamine is also produced inside the brain.

H3 receptors in the brain modulate the release of histamine.  Histamine release in the brain triggers secondary release of excitatory neurotransmitters such as glutamate and acetylcholine via stimulation of H1 receptors in the cerebral cortex. Consequently, unlike the H1 antagonist antihistamines which are sedating, H3 antagonists have stimulant and nootropic effects, and are being researched as potential drugs for the treatment of neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and also for ADHD.

H1 agonists should increase appetite and H3 agonists should reduce appetite.  So one day do not be surprised to read about wonder H3 slimming pills.

Outside the brain (CNS) all four types of receptor are found and have specific functions.

H1 receptors modulate circadian rhythm (sleep) as well as all those allergy and asthma symptoms.

H2 receptors modulate sinus rhythm (in your heart), stimulate  gastric acid secretion, inhibit antibody synthesis, T-cell proliferation and cytokine production.

So histamine dysfunction would contribute to many conditions that are known to be comorbid with autism:-

·        Obesity and also low appetite (both extremes)
·        Poor sleep
·        GERD/GORD/reflux
·        Cognitive impairment
·        Allergy
·        Mood disorders

As usual things are complicated, because the histamine receptors are slightly different in each part of the brain so your histamine antagonist/blocker “sticks” better on some than on others.  So one H1 antihistamine will be more sedating, or more appetite-increasing than another one.



H1 antihistamines in Autism

Most attention in this blog has been directed to the effect of H1 antihistamines outside the brain/CNS.  To a greater or lesser extent, all H1 antihistamines are also mast cell stabilizers.  They reduce the release of histamine itself, as well as blocking H1 receptors (and so relieving allergy symptoms).

Blocking the release of histamine outside the BBB stops the release of inflammatory cytokines like IL-6, which can, directly or indirectly, cross the blood brain barrier.

However many people report that common H1 antihistamines seem to improve autistic behavior, irrespective of any allergy being present. My assumption is that this may be the case with nine year old girl, certainly worth investigating.

Either there is a mild allergy that has gone unnoticed, or this must be the effect of blocking H1 receptors within the brain/CNS.


H3 antihistamines in Autism

I think it quite likely that some people with autism and schizophrenia would experience cognitive improvement from H3 antagonists.

It is perhaps odd that nobody has investigated the cognitive effects of Betahistine.

Betahistine has a very strong affinity as an antagonist for histamine  H3 receptors and a weak affinity as an agonist for histamine H1 receptors.

The disadvantage is that betahistine increases histamine levels outside the BBB, so not good for someone with asthma.


There is data on the effect of Betahistine on weight gain in schizophrenia:-


Reducing antipsychotic-induced weight gain in schizophrenia: a double-blind placebo-controlled study of reboxetine-betahistine combination.

It was safe, well tolerated and did reduce weight gain.  I would have liked to know the effect on cognitive function.





Conclusion

There may be too much histamine being released, or its degradation might be impaired (DAO, SAMe, & HMT are all implicated in autism/schizophrenia), or there may be over/under expression of histamine receptors in certain places.

For example in schizophrenia,  metabolites of histamine are increased in the cerebrospinal fluid of people, while the efficiency of H1 receptor binding sites is decreased.

The role of the central histaminergic system on schizophrenia.



It would not be surprising if people with autism and histamine/mast cell related issues outside the brain, also have central (in the brain) histamine dysfunctions.

There are only 24,000 genes found in humans (there are 700+ autism genes).  As a result these genes have to be reused many times all over the body.  Any dysfunction may be reappear in surprising parts of the body.  Add to this the way the body is controlled by feedback loops and you can see a how very many things are inter-related.

This also explains why very clever ideas can work in vitro (in the lab) but completely fail when applied to humans. "Stumbled upon", which must really annoy some clever scientists, is a very valid discovery method and can still earn you top marks.

This also means that many potential therapies can have unintended side effects. Like the H3 antagonist Betahistine, which can cause gastric acid problems and itching.  Betahistine acting in the brain might be good for cognition, but might not be without drawbacks elsewhere in the body.


Coming back to Tom and Jerry and where this post started

As usual Jerry got the better of Tom.

Since continued used of Remeron might lead to obesity, it would be interesting to see if the autism benefits were maintained by using a more conventional H1 antihistamine.  The older ones should better cross the BBB, but will be more sedative.

The people currently using conventional H1 antihistamines to treat their n=1 case of autism, might want to compare the effect of the very small dose of Remeron.

The people using second generation conventional H1 antihistamines (Zyrtec, Claritin etc) to treat their n=1 case of autism might want to compare the effect of the old fashioned versions that, like Remeron, have high much higher HR occupancy in the brain.



For those still hungry (too much histamine) for more:-



Histamine H3 receptor antagonists/inverse agonists on cognitive and motor processes: relevance to Alzheimer's disease, ADHD, schizophrenia, and drug abuse


The role of hypothalamic H1receptor antagonism in antipsychotic-induced weight gain.

  

Therapeutic potential of histamine H3 receptor agonist for thetreatment of obesity and diabetes mellitus